Insurance Policy's Animal Exclusion Barred Coverage of Suit Stemming from Accident Involving Horse
FCS LEGAL This story is reprinted with permission from FC&S Legal, the industry's only comprehensive digital resource designed for insurance coverage…
August 23, 2018 at 10:25 AM
4 minute read
FCS LEGAL This story is reprinted with permission from FC&S Legal, the industry's only comprehensive digital resource designed for insurance coverage law professionals. Visit the website to subscribe.
A federal district court in Texas has ruled that an insurance company had no duty to defend or indemnify a club sued by the parents of a girl who died after a horse she was riding at the club fell on her – even if the parents contended that the horse fell because of a dangerous condition at the club.
The Case
Brian and Rhonda Faust's daughter died after a horse she was riding fell on her during a sporting event at the Burleson County Saddle Club. The Fausts sued the club, asserting that it was liable for their daughter's death because a dangerous condition at the club had caused the horse to fall.
After the club sought coverage for the Fausts' suit from its insurer, Colony Insurance Company, Colony sought a declaration from the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas that it had no duty to defend or indemnify the club against claims brought by the Fausts.
Relying on its policy's exclusion precluding coverage for any injury arising directly or indirectly from contact with animals, Colony moved for summary judgment. It argued that the exclusion applied because the complained-of injury arose directly from a horse falling on the Fausts' daughter.
The Colony Policy
The Colony policy provided:
This insurance does not apply to “bodily injury”, “property damage” or “personal and advertising injury” arising directly or indirectly out of . . . animals.
The District Court's Decision
The district court granted the motion.
In its decision, the district court explained that the Fausts alleged that a horse “slipped on a dangerous latent condition on the land” and fell on their daughter, causing serious injuries that led to her death. According to the district court, these allegations demonstrated that Piper Faust's death arose directly or indirectly “out of animals” and that the horse was a but-for cause of her death.
The district court rejected the argument asserted by the Fausts and the club that the animal exclusion in Colony's policy did not apply because the injury to Piper Faust did not “aris[e] directly or indirectly” from contact with the horse but that the but-for cause in this case was a dangerous premises condition and not the horse that fell on Piper Faust.
According to the district court, an incident “may have many but-for causes” and, here, the horse was a but-for cause. Thus, the district court ruled, the injury to Piper Faust arose “directly or indirectly” from contact with an animal and fell outside the scope of the Colony insurance policy.
The district court concluded that because the Fausts did not allege facts that would potentially state a cause of action falling within the terms of the policy, Colony had no duty to defend or indemnify the club in the Fausts' suit.
The case is Colony Ins. Co. v. Burleson County Saddle Club, No. AU-17-CA-01051-SS (W.D. Tex. Aug. 16, 2018). Attorneys involved include: For Colony Insurance Company, Plaintiff, Counter Defendant: Matthew Rigney, LEAD ATTORNEY, Stephen Andrew Melendi, Tollefson Bradley Mitchell & Melendi, LLP, Dallas, TX. For Burleson County Saddle Club, Inc., Defendant, Counter Plaintiff: Michael S. Simpson, LEAD ATTORNEY, David E. Chamberlain, Chamberlain McHaney, Austin, TX. For Brian Faust, Individually and as Representative of the Estate and Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Piper Faust, Deceased, Rhonda Faust, Individually and as Representative of the Estate and Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Piper Faust, Deceased, Defendants: R. Scott Westlund, LEAD ATTORNEY, Ketterman Rowland & Westlund, San Antonio, TX.
Steven A. Meyerowitz, Esq., is the Director of FC&S Legal, the Editor-in-Chief of the Insurance Coverage Law Report, and the Founder and President of Meyerowitz Communications Inc. As FC&S Legal Director, Mr. Meyerowitz, a member of the team that conceptualized FC&S Legal, provides daily analysis and commentary on the most significant insurance coverage law decisions from courts across the country and news regarding legislative and regulatory developments. A graduate of Harvard Law School, Mr. Meyerowitz was an attorney at a prominent Wall Street law firm before founding Meyerowitz Communications Inc., a law firm marketing communications consulting company.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAmid Growing Litigation Volume, Don't Expect UnitedHealthcare to Change Its Stripes After CEO's Killing
6 minute readAlston & Bird Achieves Higher Rating for Medicare Advantage Insurance Companies
3 minute readDallas Court of Appeals Lets Stand Injury Caused by State Farm Payment Delay
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: The Recorder and Law.com's California Legal Awards 2025
- 2The Week in Data Dec. 13: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
- 3Antitrust Class Actions Against CVS, Other Pharmacy Benefit Managers Are Piling Up
- 4Judge Grinds NY's Cannabis Licensing Regime to a Halt Again
- 5On the Move and After Hours: Barclay Damon; VLJ; Barnes & Thornburg
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250