McKool Smith Wins $10.6M Verdict in 4G LTE Patent Case
Huawei Technologies was found to have willfully infringed patents originally developed by Panasonic and Ericsson.
August 29, 2018 at 05:00 PM
2 minute read
McKool Smith has won a $10.6 million jury verdict in a trial over 4G LTE and video compression patents.
Partner Theodore Stevenson III led the trial team for Optis Wireless Technology LLC, Optis Cellular LLC and PanOptis Patent Management LLC. Known collectively as Pan Optis, the companies hold standard-essential patents originally assigned to Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson and Panasonic Corp.
Pan Optis spent years in negotiations with Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. over fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory (FRAND) royalties. But talks broke down and Pan Optis sued last year in the Eastern District of Texas.
Following a five-day trial before U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, a jury found Monday that Huawei infringed all six asserted claims from five different patents, and did so willfully, opening the door to treble damages. The jury further turned away Huawei's validity attacks on all six claims.
“The jury was focused and worked very hard to understand the complex technology and the many patents that are involved in the case,” Stevenson said in a written statement. “Our client is pleased with the verdict.”
Huawei isn't finished with its validity challenges. Earlier this year, the company filed administrative challenges at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board on four of the six patent claims at issue in the trial. They include claim 1 of U.S. Patent 7,769,238, the video coding patent, which accounts for $7.7 million of the $10.6 million jury award. The PTAB is expected to decide next month whether to institute inter partes review on those patents.
Covington & Burling is representing Huawei at trial and before the PTAB. Senior counsel Robert Haslam led the trial team while former PTAB Administrative Patent Judge Peter Chen is lead counsel in the PTAB proceedings.
McKool Smith's trial team also included partners Sam Baxter, Kevin Burgess, Lindsay Martin Leavitt and Jennifer Truelove and associates Christine Woodin, Kevin Hess and Marcus Rabinowitz. Gray Reed & McGraw also provided counsel to Pan Optis.
Brent Bumgardner of Nelson Bumgardner Allbritton is representing Optis Wireless at the PTAB.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNo Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
5 minute readEnergy Lawyers Field Client Questions as Trump Issues Executive Orders on Industry Funding, Oversight
6 minute readHolland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Corporate Litigator Joins BakerHostetler From Fish & Richardson
- 2E-Discovery Provider Casepoint Merges With Government Software Company OPEXUS
- 3How I Made Partner: 'Focus on Being the Best Advocate for Clients,' Says Lauren Reichardt of Cooley
- 4People in the News—Jan. 27, 2025—Barley Snyder
- 5UK Firm Womble Bond to Roll Out AI Tool Across Whole Firm
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250