Judge James Rodney Gilstrap. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALMMcKool Smith Wins $10.6M Verdict in 4G LTE Patent Case
Huawei Technologies was found to have willfully infringed patents originally developed by Panasonic and Ericsson.
August 29, 2018 at 05:00 PM
2 minute read
McKool Smith has won a $10.6 million jury verdict in a trial over 4G LTE and video compression patents.
Partner Theodore Stevenson III led the trial team for Optis Wireless Technology LLC, Optis Cellular LLC and PanOptis Patent Management LLC. Known collectively as Pan Optis, the companies hold standard-essential patents originally assigned to Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson and Panasonic Corp.
Pan Optis spent years in negotiations with Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. over fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory (FRAND) royalties. But talks broke down and Pan Optis sued last year in the Eastern District of Texas.
Following a five-day trial before U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, a jury found Monday that Huawei infringed all six asserted claims from five different patents, and did so willfully, opening the door to treble damages. The jury further turned away Huawei's validity attacks on all six claims.
“The jury was focused and worked very hard to understand the complex technology and the many patents that are involved in the case,” Stevenson said in a written statement. “Our client is pleased with the verdict.”
Huawei isn't finished with its validity challenges. Earlier this year, the company filed administrative challenges at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board on four of the six patent claims at issue in the trial. They include claim 1 of U.S. Patent 7,769,238, the video coding patent, which accounts for $7.7 million of the $10.6 million jury award. The PTAB is expected to decide next month whether to institute inter partes review on those patents.
Covington & Burling is representing Huawei at trial and before the PTAB. Senior counsel Robert Haslam led the trial team while former PTAB Administrative Patent Judge Peter Chen is lead counsel in the PTAB proceedings.
McKool Smith's trial team also included partners Sam Baxter, Kevin Burgess, Lindsay Martin Leavitt and Jennifer Truelove and associates Christine Woodin, Kevin Hess and Marcus Rabinowitz. Gray Reed & McGraw also provided counsel to Pan Optis.
Brent Bumgardner of Nelson Bumgardner Allbritton is representing Optis Wireless at the PTAB.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Energy Lawyers Expect Demand for Energy Work to Stay Steady Under Second Trump Administration
3 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1Obtaining Reimbursement from Medicaid
- 2NY Requiring Lawyers to Report Out-of-State Admissions, Public Discipline
- 3Man Hits Cow in Case That Tests 'Unrealistic Delivery Times'
- 4DC Judge, Applying 'Loper Bright,' Dismisses Complaint in Medicare Drug-Classification Dispute
- 5Environmental Law in Trump’s Second Term
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
