Houston Lawyer Michael Pohl Files Suit Alleging 3 Lawyers Stole His Trade Secrets
Michael Pohl, who faces litigation in Houston alleging he engaged in barratry, sued a former public relations consultant and three lawyers and their firms, alleging they misappropriated his confidential information and used it for their own gain.
August 30, 2018 at 05:37 PM
4 minute read
Houston lawyer Michael Pohl has filed a lawsuit alleging three lawyers and their firms, as well as a marketer who once worked for him, conspired to misappropriate his trade secrets and other confidential information and used it for their own gain—with the lawyers using it specifically to file litigation against Pohl for alleged barratry and other claims.
Pohl, of Law Office of Michael A. Pohl, seeks more than $1 million in damages from the defendants.
The suit, filed Tuesday, names Lance Kassab and The Kassab Law Firm of Houston; Tina Nicholson and Baker Nicholson of Houston; and F. Douglas Montague III and Montague Pittman & Varnado of Hattiesburg, Mississippi. Other defendants are Mississippi public adjuster Scott Favre and his public relations and marketing company, Precision Marketing Group.
“Defendants engaged in a scheme pursuant to which they illegally obtained, maintained, and used trade secrets and other confidential information and property belonging to Pohl,” Pohl alleged in a petition filed in the 189th District Court in Harris County.
Pohl alleged that Favre's and Precision's actions breached a 2017 settlement agreement in an underlying lawsuit filed in federal court in Mississippi, and all of the defendants' actions constitute conversion, violations of the Texas Uniform Trade Secrets Act, and conspiracy.
Kassab dismissed the charges.
“This is a retaliation lawsuit. As far as I'm concerned, it goes with the territory,” said Kassab, whose practice focuses on suing lawyers for legal malpractice and other claims.
The other defendants could not immediately be reached for comment.
In the petition, Pohl, who represents clients in motor vehicle accident suits and in litigation stemming from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, alleged he hired Precision to “provide public relations services, to gather and preserve evidence, and to screen and liaise with Pohl's clients/prospective clients.” Pohl alleged that Precision gained access to his confidential and proprietary information, which included the names of his clients and prospective clients and fee agreements.
Pohl alleged that Favre and Precision, with Nicholson's assistance, misappropriated information and communications with as many as 10,000 clients or potential clients and “stole physical copies of certain of the information, stole Pohl's computers and misappropriated electronic data.”
He also alleged that Favre, again with Nicholson, “then secretly sold Pohl's stolen confidential information and property to Kassab and Montague” for $250,000 in cash and the potential for bonuses.
Pohl alleged that Kassab and Montague knew the information and property were stolen, used the information to solicit Pohl's clients, and with Nicholson and Montague, filed suits on behalf of Pohl's clients alleging barratry and other claims.
In addition, Pohl alleged that Favre and Precision's actions violate a confidential settlement agreement in another lawsuit that was filed in federal court in Mississippi, and that Nicholson represented Favre and Precision in connection with the settlement agreement while at the same time serving as co-counsel with Kassab and Montague in the barratry suits.
In 2017, Kassab filed a suit in state court in Harris County against Pohl and other lawyers, alleging they participated in a “barratry pyramid scheme” to solicit clients to sue BP over the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. According to Kassab, a judge dismissed the barratry cause of action in that suit, but barratry claims remain pending in two other suits he filed against Pohl and others in June 2017 alleging that Pohl and others engaged in a joint venture to unlawfully solicit automobile accident clients. The defendants denied the allegations in the suits.
In an interview, Kassab said any money paid to Favre was for a retainer because he is an expert witness.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHomegrown Texas Law Firms Expanded Outside the Lone Star State in 2024 As Out-of-State Firms Moved In
5 minute readEnergy Lawyers Working in Texas Expect Strong Demand to Continue in 2025 Across Energy Sector
6 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': Big Law Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250