A Year After Harvey, Orrick Public Finance Lawyers Help Prevent Future Flooding in Houston
A team of public finance lawyers from Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe in Houston did pro bono work to help Harris County put on a special bond election that raised $2.5 billion for flood-prevention projects.
August 31, 2018 at 06:06 PM
3 minute read
One year after Hurricane Harvey hit Texas, dumping rain that resulted in massive flooding in Houston, voters in Harris County overwhelmingly approved $2.5 billion in bonds for flood-prevention projects—an effort supported by pro bono work from public finance lawyers at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe.
The Orrick pro bono team, led by senior counsel Bob Collie, advised the Harris County Attorney's Office on the Aug. 25 special election for the bonds, and also worked with the Fight Flooding Political Action Committee, which Collie said raised about $1.35 million to promote the bond votes.
The Orrick team was “very helpful, as they always are,” said Douglas Ray, managing attorney of the public law practice group at the Harris County Attorney's Office.
Collie, a former Houston city attorney, said he and other public finance lawyers he works with have long done work for Harris County on bond elections and public finance. The firm's work on the flood-prevention bonds was worth at least $50,000, said Todd Brewer, an Orrick public finance partner who also worked on the project.
Collie said that after Gov. Greg Abbott on May 7 approved the Aug. 25 special bond election, Orrick started working with the West Houston Association, a regional business group, on the Fight Flooding PAC. They also gave advice to Harris County about the special election, which can be complicated in Texas because of many requirements under federal voting rights laws, such as providing notice to the public in English, Spanish, Vietnamese and Mandarin.
Collie said the Orrick team helped the PAC with record-keeping and met with in-house lawyers at a half-dozen companies in Houston that wanted details of how the PAC money would be used to support the bond election.
He said much of the money was spent on direct mail targeting likely voters, and some local radio and television advertisements.
Also, the Harris County Flood Control District held 23 public meetings to inform voters of what projects the bond money would support and to get their input on how the money should be spent. Collie said Orrick assisted county officials at those meetings and in preparing summaries of suggestions from the public.
Collie said the special election was on a very fast track between the May 7 authorization by the the governor and the designated election day. Results were favorable, with 86 percent of voters approving the bonds. Ray said he expects Harris County will hire Orrick lawyers to assist with public finance work as the bonds are sold over the next few years.
Orrick has quickly built a public finance group in Texas totaling more than 25 lawyers. Brewer joined the firm in 2016, shortly after the California-based firm opened its Houston office. In February, Collie joined Orrick as part of a group of six public finance lawyers who left Andrews Kurth Kenyon before its merger with Hunton & Williams. Another 14 Andrews Kurth public finance lawyers joined Orrick's Texas offices shortly afterward.
In addition to Collie and Brewer, other Orrick public finance lawyers who helped with the flood-prevention bonds include senior counsel Gene Locke—another former Houston city attorney— as well as partner Adrian Patterson and managing associate Ben Morse.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readDLA Piper Sued by 2 Houston Companies, Alleging a 'Fake Lawyer' Represented Them in Argentina
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250