Ex-Inmate Sues Texas Defense Attorneys After Pleading Guilty on Voided Criminal Statute
A former Texas prison inmate has filed a legal malpractice case against his former criminal defense attorneys, claiming he spent nearly two years in…
September 04, 2018 at 03:31 PM
4 minute read
A former Texas prison inmate has filed a legal malpractice case against his former criminal defense attorneys, claiming he spent nearly two years in a penitentiary because of the bad legal advice.
Plaintiff Colton Lester recently filed a lawsuit in an East Texas district court seeking more than $1 million in damages against Nacogdoches attorney Seth Johnson and Onalaska attorney Cecil Berg, alleging he was wrongfully imprisoned because of their gross negligence.
According to his petition, Lester was charged with attempted online solicitation of a minor in 2014, when he was 17 years old. The nature of the conduct leading up to the charge is not detailed in the petition.
That year he hired Johnson to represent him. Johnson told Lester he was a criminal law specialist and, after investigating the matter, advised him to plead guilty. Johnson negotiated a deal with prosecutors that placed Lester on deferred adjudication probation for five years.
In 2016, a motion to revoke Lester's probation was filed, and Berg represented him in a probation revocation hearing, which resulted in Lester being sentenced to three years in the Texas Department of Corrections.
However, in 2017, Lester was contacted by the State Counsel for Offenders, who informed him for the first time that the statute upon which he was convicted was void prior to his offense date. In 2013, the Court of Criminal Appeals had ruled in Ex Parte Lo that section 33.021(b) of the Texas Penal Code—the law that established online solicitation of a minor as a felony—was unconstitutional as vague and overly broad. Lester's conviction was ultimately vacated by the CCA in 2018, according to the petition.
“Unbelievably, and most egregiously, defendants failed to disclose to Lester that the statute under which he was charged was void and non-existent,” the petition alleges.
“Thus, due to defendants' negligence, gross negligence and breach of fiduciary duty, Lester lost his freedom at the tender age of 19 and was forced to endure almost two years of prison time for allegedly committing a crime that did not exist,” the petition continued. “Lester was thrown in prison at a time in his life when his friends and others his age were entering college and/or planning for their future in the world. Needless to say, Lester has suffered severe emotional distress due to the gross misconduct of defendants and lost time that can never be returned to him.”
Johnson declined to comment, and Berg did not return a call for comment.
David Kassab, a Houston legal malpractice attorney who represents Lester, alleges that Johnson and Berg “messed up and they need to be held accountable like any other professional.”
Kassab noted that legal malpractice cases against criminal defense attorneys are rare in Texas because of the Peeler Doctrine—a rule derived from the 1995 Texas Supreme Court decision in Peeler v. Hughes & Luce, which held that a person convicted of a crime cannot sue his criminal defense attorney for legal malpractice unless he has been exonerated by an appellate court.
“Not many cases come across our desk where the client has been exonerated, which is rare in Texas because you have to prove that you've been exonerated to sue your lawyer,” Kassab said. “You can literally sleep through the entire trial, and unless the client was exonerated, there is not much the client can do about it.''
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTexas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
3 minute readSamsung Flooded With Galaxy Product Patent Lawsuits in Texas Federal Court
Haynes Boone, Hicks Thomas Get Dismissal of $1.3B Claims in 2022 Freeport LNG Terminal Explosion
3 minute readIn Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250