CFPB Suffers Another Appeals Court Loss Over Investigative Authority
"Providing and using public records are not violations of federal law, and the CFPB fails to explain how these activities violate federal consumer law,” the Fifth Circuit said Thursday.
September 06, 2018 at 03:06 PM
4 minute read
Updated 8:05 p.m.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, whose investigations have long been criticized by the financial industry as overbroad and burdensome, has stumbled again in a court fight over a company's refusal to provide documents demanded by the agency.
On Thursday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit struck down an administrative subpoena—known as a civil investigative demand—the CFPB issued to the Source for Public Data L.P., which runs a website offering access to public records. In a six-page ruling, a three-judge panel of the court sided with Public Data's argument that the CFPB failed to adequately advise the company of the specific conduct under investigation.
Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod, writing for the unanimous three-judge panel, said the CFPB's notice that it was investigating “unlawful acts and practices in connection with the provision or use of public records information” fell short of stating the conduct at issue in the investigation.
“Simply put, this notification of purpose does not identify what conduct, it believes, constitutes an alleged violation. Providing and using public records are not violations of federal law, and the CFPB fails to explain how these activities violate federal consumer law,” Elrod wrote.
The Source for Public Data was represented by Troutman Sanders. “The Fifth Circuit's decision upholds limits that Congress placed on the CFPB's investigatory powers and will serve as an important defense against overreaching government investigations,” Ron Raether, the Troutman Sanders partner who argued the appeal, said in a statement.
The CFPB did not immediately comment.
The ruling came a year after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit rejected another CFPB investigation. The agency had issued a subpoena to the Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools, a gatekeeper for federal student aid dollars. Brett Kavanaugh, a D.C. Circuit judge and U.S. Supreme Court nominee, was not on that panel.
The CFPB has been in sharp focus the past two days at Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing for the high court. Kavanaugh was a leading critic of the agency as a sitting D.C. Circuit judge, writing in a landmark ruling PHH v. CFPB that the agency's single-director leader held too much power with too little oversight. Republican and Democratic senators have grilled Kavanaugh over that hearing.
Kavanaugh stressed at his hearing that he did not vote to invalidate the CFPB as a whole. Rather, his ruling, later overturned by the en banc court, said the president should have power to remove the director at will, not just “for cause.” The constitutionality of the CFPB's structure is expected to return to the Supreme Court, perhaps this term. The Fifth Circuit has a pending case that tees up that issue. In that case, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher partner Ted Olson represents the challengers.
Thursday's ruling by the Fifth Circuit overturned a decision from U.S. Magistrate Judge David Horan, who ordered Public Data to comply with the CFPB's demands in June 2017. Before being taken to court, Public Data had challenged the investigative demand through the CFPB's administrative process. Like all other companies that went through that process, Public Data lost on the appeal to the CFPB director at the time, Richard Cordray.
Mick Mulvaney, the interim CFPB director, showed an early interest in the agency's investigations. When he began soliciting comments earlier this year on virtually every aspect of the CFPB's operations, civil investigative demands emerged as the first area under consideration.
So far, Mulvaney has ruled on only one challenge to a civil investigative demand, according to the CFPB website. In late July, he rejected Firstsource Advantage's appeal and ordered the company to produce the documents requested by the CFPB within 14 days.
The Fifth Circuit's ruling is posted below:
|
➤➤ Our weekly briefing Compliance Hot Spots provides the latest news and trends in compliance and enforcement—what regulators are up to and how firms and in-house counsel are crafting new strategies. Learn more and sign up here.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJoining Effort to Beat Down NLRB, Amazon Suit Calls Agency's Administrative Process 'Constitutional Infirmity'
3 minute read737 Max Crash Victims' Families Blast Proposed Boeing Punishment as 'Sweetheart Deal'
5 minute readChallenges to Noncompete Ban Already Hitting Courts, Setting Up Showdown Over FTC's Powers
Target Promotes General Counsel Matt Zabel to New Role, Phases Out GC Post
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250