Lawyer Sues Pagel Davis for Nonpayment of Referral Fees
Houston lawyer John Lunstroth sues Pagel, Davis & Hill, alleging the Houston firm stopped paying him a share of fees generated by clients he brought to the firm.
September 26, 2018 at 01:39 PM
3 minute read
Houston lawyer John Lunstroth filed a $1 million lawsuit against Houston firm Pagel, Davis & Hill, alleging it breached an agreement when it abruptly stopped paying him a share of fees generated by clients he brought to the firm.
Lunstroth is seeking more than $1 million in damages from the firm.
Lunstroth alleges in the suit he filed in state court in Harris County on Sept. 21 that he entered into an agreement in June 2016 with Pagel Davis for a portion of fees generated by clients he brought to the firm. He alleges the firm agreed to pay him 10 percent of the fees generated by the clients' continuing business.
Under the agreement, Lunstroth alleges, he referred “numerous” clients that resulted in “considerable” fees for the firm.
“Recognizing and honoring the agreement, defendant issued payments to plaintiff for several clients. Without any explanation, defendant has abruptly discontinued these payments,” Lunstroth alleges in the petition.
In Lunstroth v. Pagel, Davis & Hill, Lunstroth alleges the firm breached a contract with him and breached its fiduciary duty.
Kent Pagel, president and senior shareholder of the firm, did not respond to a request for comment.
Buzbee Law Firm founder Anthony Buzbee, who represents Lunstroth, was at a hearing in California on Tuesday and did not respond to a request for comment.
According to the State Bar of Texas membership record, Lunstroth is a solo practitioner who works as law faculty. On his LinkedIn page, he lists his employment as a visiting scholar at the University of Houston Law Center. On the school's website he is listed as a lecturer in the Honors College. Lunstroth also did not respond to a request for comment.
This is not the first time Lunstroth has sued Pagel Davis. On June 4, Lunstroth brought a malpractice suit against the firm in his role as executor of the estate of William Stender.
In that suit, Lunstroth alleges the estate of Stender, who died on June 6, 2016, hired Pagel Davis to represent its interests in probate court. Lunstroth alleges the firm misrepresented Stender's interests in several businesses.
He alleges the firm previously represented Stender in connection with several business interests but also represented other individuals who had ownership interests in several of those companies.
“And after Stender's death, PDH [Pagel Davis] made the decision to conceal the value of Stender's actual business interests,” he alleges in the petition.
Lunstroth seeks unspecified damages on behalf of the estate and brings several causes of action against the firm, including breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, negligence and malpractice.
On July 23, Pagel Davis filed an answer denying the allegations in the malpractice suit and requesting that the plaintiff take nothing.
The suits apparently will not be heard by the same judge. The fee suit Lunstroth filed Sept. 21 is assigned to the 151st District Court and the malpractice suit is filed in the 61st District Court. On Tuesday, 151st District Judge Mike Engelhart, the administrative judge for the civil trial division, ordered that the Harris County District Clerk's office shall not transfer the suit filed in his court to 61st District Judge Fredericka Phillips' court.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllVinson & Elkins Expands Environmental Team with Chair of Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
4 minute readNondisparagement Clauses in Divorce: Balancing Family Harmony and Free Speech
6 minute readHouston Trial Lawyer Mary-Olga Lovett Leaves King & Spalding to Open Boutique
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250