More Disorder in the Court
Our courts deal with the most serious of issues every day, making what in some cases are literally life or death decisions. So you can imagine how welcome…
September 30, 2018 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Our courts deal with the most serious of issues every day, making what in some cases are literally life or death decisions. So you can imagine how welcome the opportunities must be to lighten up—while still doing justice. And if you don't believe me, just check out these examples.
A Complimentary Ruling
In October 2017, Maui Judge Rhonda Loo took a novel approach in sentencing Daren Young on a domestic matter. The 30-year-old had pleaded no contest to violating a protective order obtained by his ex-girlfriend, for his sending 144 “nasty” text messages and calls. So Judge Loo embraced a “teachable moment,” ordering Young to write 144 compliments about his ex-girlfriend—with no repeating of words (he also was sentenced to time already served, two years of probation, 200 hours of community service, and $2,400 in fines). For Young's sake, let's hope one of her praiseworthy traits is “a forgiving nature.”
Don't Like Jury Duty? How About More Jury Duty?
Hillsborough , Florida Circuit Court Judge William Fuente didn't borrow a page out of Judge Loo's book, but he did find a novel way to punish misbehaving juror Vishnu Singh. Singh had been picked as a juror on a sexual assault/murder trial in Fuente's court, but had to be removed after it was discovered that he had gone online to research the case—a blatant violation of the judge's instructions. But rather than impose a fine or sentence Singh to jail, Judge Fuente decided on a novel way to teach the ex-juror about the importance of jury duty. He ordered Singh to jury duty for one week per month for the next three months; if he fails to perform, he'll have to serve five days in jail. That'll teach him.
This Court Demands a Shrubbery
Monty Python fans are everywhere; I've even written an entire article about Monty Python references in judicial opinions (see 78 Tex. B.J. 520, July 2015). So I can't say I was surprised when I saw that California lawyer Darren Bean invoked a pivotal moment from the movie “Monty Python and the Holy Grail” in a recent motion to suppress hearing, arguing that a shrubbery did not constitute probable cause for a traffic stop and subsequent seizure. Bean's client had been stopped near a southern California state park (in a desert area) by a ranger because the ranger “observed a desert shrub stuck to the vehicle's front bumper.” Pointing out that “the mere presence of [a] shrubbery does not give rise to [reasonable] suspicion of violating the law,” Bean referenced Monty Python in arguing that the ranger, “apparently assuming [the defendant] was headed to meet the Knights Who Say Ni, pulled [the car] over to investigate.” Of course, in “Monty Python and the Holy Grail,” the shadowy “Knights Who Say Ni” oddly demand “a shrubbery” as tribute. Bean's Monty Python reference clearly worked since the judge agreed and the state later dismissed the case.
A GIF-Worthy Moment
U.S. District Judge R. David Proctor of Alabama, presiding over a large antitrust case involving Blue Cross and Blue Shield, recently had quite enough of what he described as “faux drama in briefing.” In a May 1, 2018 order addressing the “rancorous briefing” that compelled him to “weigh in on this current chapter of the parties' discovery soap opera,” Judge Proctor cautioned both sides about puffery. But he didn't stop with his written admonitions about the parties' “strong language” or overly long briefs. Instead, Judge Proctor also chose to make his point in a 21st century way by linking to an animated GIF—in this case, the image of a skeptical-looking Tom Hanks with the caption “Really?”. In some cases, a picture really is worth a thousand words.
How About a Dance-Off, Bro?
Disgraced FBI agent Chase Bishop may want to invoke the preferred form of dispute resolution of Guardians of the Galaxy's Star Lord. Bishop is facing assault charges for accidentally shooting someone at a Denver, Colorado bar. In a video that went viral, the FBI agent was showing off his dance moves at the Mile High Spirits bar on June 2, 2018, and his pistol fell out of his waistband holster while Bishop was launching into a back handspring. When Bishop went to pick up his firearm, it discharged, striking one club patron in the leg. The FBI agent better hope his lawyer has some slick moves of his own.
John G. Browning is a shareholder at Passman & Jones in Dallas, where he handles a wide variety of civil litigation in state and federal courts.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Narcissist’s Dilemma: Balancing Power and Inadequacy in Family Law
8 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250