Addressing #MeToo Transgressions Begins By Admitting We Have a Problem—A Problem That Implicates All of Us
"We" are the men who are not #MeToo transgressors, but who still refuse to the see the problem. We try to absolve our responsibility by saying things like "boys will be boys." We minimize complaints. We avert our gaze.
October 05, 2018 at 01:35 PM
5 minute read
The cultural shift that has occurred this last year around #MeToo is momentous. Women are being empowered to identify and remove from power those men who have engaged in sexual misconduct in the workplace. While these efforts are noteworthy, they are occurring downstream from the source, where there's plenty more where Harvey Weinstein and Bill Cosby came from. How do we correct misconduct at the source, heading it off upstream before it becomes problematic and results in victims downstream? And for those men who have exhibited problematic behavior, what's required to get them to change?
First, we must understand that before there is behavior, there is an attitude, and that attitude is what drives the behavior. So, as in any 12-Step program, people exhibiting problematic behavior must admit it; it is impossible to solve a problem that does not exist. That admission would go something like this: “I admit there is a problem not only in my behavior, but also in my attitude, and having harmed others as a result of these behaviors my life has become unmanageable.”
The attitude is ingrained, acculturated, accepted and overlooked by millennia of patriarchal norms. At its worst, the patriarchy sees women as second class and as a kind of possession. Buried in this attitude is an unspoken, unacknowledged fear—a fear of what might happen if women are given full and equal status, their souls and bodies belonging fully to themselves and not to whatever male they might be affiliated with through employment, marriage, etc. This fear continually sends men the message that a woman's autonomy will result in a loss of masculinity. I once heard it said that the sense of male sovereignty—what we are referring to when we refer to “manhood”—is something hard won and easily lost. Instead of resting on strength, it rests on weakness.
Sexual crime, the issue at hand in #MeToo, is an expression of that fear. It's an expression that refuses to give women an equal share in sex. Predators seek to eliminate her ability to choose. It is an unwitting expression of weakness, hidden behind a counterfeit display of power and control. But, within it is also an expression of self loathing: I am so unable to accept the vulnerability I feel in my sexual longings that I reject it entirely and resort to violence instead. I can only feel safe when I have sabotaged the other's power.
When observing patterns of behavior in abusers like Harvey Weinstein and Bill Cosby, and all the other men we've heard about over the last year, we are seeing something else I personally have not seen mentioned: the issue of addiction. In all of these stories, there is the element of repetition, over and over and over again. The same behaviors, the same modus operandi, the same ritual. Who is it that exhibits these rituals of repetition if not the addict?
These are people addicted to the hormonal rush of power and control, and also, perhaps less obviously, transgression. Transgression is the intentional, willing act of doing something you know to be wrong and doing it anyway, because you think you can. This behavior becomes the regular distributor of massive dopamine rushes, and these become hooked to it. I contend that these behaviors should be treated as addictions before they lead to victimization of others; and in cases where a sexual crime occurs, the perpetrator should be punished.
When a man sincerely takes that first step to treatment—admitting he has a problem—he is sabotaging his own fortress, forfeiting the fantasy of control, and for perhaps the first time in his life having to address his own sexual longings and the vulnerability that goes with them.
But trying to corral #MeToo offenders into sincere self-redress and correction is only a part of what must happen. The fact is, we have a societal problem. It is not just the offenders who must take this important first step, it is all of us. Who is this 'We'? It is anyone who prefers denial of its existence over confrontation of the issue.
“We” are the men who are not #MeToo transgressors, but who still refuse to the see the problem. We try to absolve our responsibility by saying things like ”boys will be boys.” We minimize complaints. We avert our gaze.
I spoke to a woman friend the other day who said something like, “I don't know what the big deal is, stuff like that has gone on forever, and it always will. Just get over it and go on about your business.” Another said, “Well, back in the '80s, things were different. What's the point of making a mountain out of a molehill from 35 years ago?” And this: “What is my son supposed to do when just anyone with a mean streak can make something up and ruin his life?”
Do I believe sexual violence can end? No, I don't, because violence of all sorts exists in the darkest corners of human nature. But if you and I can admit that yes, that potential for violence exists—and that it lives in me as it lives in us all—we shine a light on it, dispelling the darkness and illuminating a pathway toward a better tomorrow.
Jim Dolan has worked as a psychotherapist and executive coach in Dallas for 40 years. His clients are adults and older teens struggling with anxiety, depression and relationship difficulties. He has also worked extensively with executives and lawyers dealing with personal problems, business development challenges, and leadership and peer relation difficulties. Website www.therapistjamesdolan.com, email [email protected]
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Virtue Begets Virtue': Tips for Practicing Law (and Living) Ethically
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Arnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
- 2Advising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
- 3Big Law’s Year—as Told in Commentaries
- 4Pa. Hospital Agrees to $16M Settlement Following High Schooler's Improper Discharge
- 5Connecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250