US Lawyers Spend Only 30 Percent of Workday on Billable Hours, Report Says
So what are they doing the rest of the day?
October 05, 2018 at 12:30 PM
4 minute read
U.S. lawyers are still spending too little of their workday on billable hours, a year after an eye-opening report found lawyers devoted only 29 percent — 2.3 hours — of each eight-hour workday to billable hours.
This year's Legal Trends Report, prepared by Clio, a Canadian company that provides cloud-based practice management for firms, found that the average utilization rate improved only incrementally to 30 percent, which is 2.4 hours of billable hours each workday.
Additionally, the third annual Legal Trends Report, made public on Thursday, finds that lawyers invoice clients for only 1.9 hours accomplished during an eight-hour workday and collect only 1.6 hours of that time.
That's a lot of time not spent on billable hours.
Instead of completing billable hours during the workday, the lawyers spend their time on billing and financials; marketing and business development; and firm organization and administration.
“The fact that lawyers miss out on nearly 5.6 hours of billable work each day should be a wake-up call for why efficiency is so important to law firms — it's a critical leverage point for increasing revenues,” Clio wrote in the report.
A large majority, 84 percent, of legal professionals surveyed for the report said they equate success with increasing firm revenue. But George Psiharis, chief operating officer for Clio, said it is surprising that few of the lawyers and other legal professionals consider factors that can increase revenue — growing a client base and billing more hours — as important factors in a firm's success. Only 34 percent of the legal professionals said growing the firm's client base is a key route to success, and only 23 percent said that billing more hours would make their firm more successful.
In contrast, 80 percent of lawyers said improving efficiency of firm operations is an important factor, and 77 percent said hiring more staff would also help the firm be successful.
“That was a big surprise for us. The top two things you think about doing for driving more revenue were at the bottom of the list,” Psiharis said.
However, increasing revenue by producing more billable hours, according to the report, is not as simple as working more than eight hours a day. Clio reports that the average full-time lawyer plans to work 46.8 hours a week, but actually works 49.6 hours a week. That adds up to an extra 3.5 weeks of unplanned work each year.
Three-quarters of lawyers report that they work outside of regular business hours, and 39 percent said that negatively affects their personal life.
The report is based on data collected from nearly 70,000 legal professionals that are Clio clients, a survey of 1,968 legal professionals, including Clio users and non-users, and a survey of 1,336 consumers. Psiharis said most of the company's clients work at firms ranging from solos to middle-market firms of about 200 lawyers.
The report also found that billing rates at U.S. firms hit an average of $245 an hour as of February 2018, a level that keeps pace with the rise in the cost of living from 2010 through February. Billing rates for nonlawyers, however, have changed little since 2011.
Some practice areas are more profitable than others, because of higher realization and collection rates. For instance, intellectual property lawyers charge an average of $327 an hour and collect $258, while lawyers who represent juvenile court clients bill an average of $87 an hour and only collect $60.
The report shows these average billing rates for lawyers in 10 large metropolitan markets: $368/hour in New York; $346 in Los Angeles; $327 in Washington, D.C.; $312 in Chicago; $305 in Atlanta; $302 in Dallas; $297 in Miami; $288 in Boston; $287 in Houston; and $269 in Philadelphia.
RELATED STORIES:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAdvising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
4 minute readHomegrown Texas Law Firms Expanded Outside the Lone Star State in 2024 As Out-of-State Firms Moved In
5 minute readEnergy Lawyers Working in Texas Expect Strong Demand to Continue in 2025 Across Energy Sector
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1First-of-Its-Kind Parkinson’s Patch at Center of Fight Over FDA Approval of Generic Version
- 2The end of the 'Rust' criminal case against Alec Baldwin may unlock a civil lawsuit
- 3Solana Labs Co-Founder Allegedly Pocketed Ex-Wife’s ‘Millions of Dollars’ of Crypto Gains
- 4What We Heard From Litigation Leaders This Year
- 5What's Next For Johnson & Johnson's Talcum Powder Litigation?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250