Fort Worth Judge Sues Fellow Jurist Over Facebook Posts
Diane Scott Haddock alleges that she was subjected to “public and private badgering, threats, back-biting, undermining and maligning” because she refused a direct command from Fort Worth's 360th District Court Judge Patricia Baca-Bennett to prevent her husband from engaging in political activity.
October 09, 2018 at 05:44 PM
3 minute read
A Fort Worth family law associate judge has filed a federal First Amendment lawsuit against a state district judge and Tarrant County claiming she was subjected to retaliation because of her husband's political views.
Diane Scott Haddock, who has served as an associate judge for nearly 20 years, alleges that she was subjected to “public and private badgering, threats, back-biting, undermining and maligning” because she refused a direct command from Fort Worth's 360th District Court Judge Patricia Baca-Bennett to prevent her husband from engaging in political activity.
In addition to naming Baca-Bennett as a defendant, Haddock also alleges that Tarrant County refused to protect her from the retaliation despite being made aware of the hostile work environment it created.
Haddock's petition details a litany of political accusations involving politics within both Tarrant County's Republican Party and the Tarrant County family law bar between Aug. 4, 2016, and May 18, 2018, including allegations that Baca-Bennett posted false or misleading posts on Facebook about Haddock's supposed “resignation” from the bench.
Haddock also alleges Baca-Bennett impugned her reputation as a judge and is preventing her from working until her planned retirement age of 65. Specifically, Haddock alleges that Facebook posts by Baca-Bennett commenting on her employment status caused her harm.
“In short, Diane had not resigned and would never have left her post in such an unprofessional way. To post otherwise was not only false and spurious, it was also embarrassing and abusive. It was also illegal, unethical and unprofessional conduct,” the petition alleges. “Moreover, the active maligning and campaigning against Diane within the courthouse walls by Baca-Bennett, as well as her Facebook posts, have created a hostile work environment for Diane.”
“Although (upon information and belief) Baca-Bennett was cautioned about her conduct by other judges, Baca-Bennett nonetheless continued to badger and slander Diane on her Facebook page, to the point that Diane now lives in fear of continued retaliation,” the petition alleges. “After [Baca-Bennett] harassed Diane on social media, then terrorized her at the courthouse in the lawyer's lounge and beyond, Diane ceased going to work on the weekends where she would be unprotected, and during the work week, Diane is now never outside the presence of her bailiff.”
Baca-Bennett did not return a call for comment. Sam Jordan, a spokeswoman for the Tarrant County District Attorney's Office who will defend the county in the case, declined to comment on the case but noted that the Texas Attorney General's Office by statute is responsible for defending Baca-Bennett.
Walter Taylor, a Colleyville lawyer who represents Haddock, declined to comment on the case.
“Diane is a judge and believes that judges should not comment on pending litigation in the media, so she's asked me not to comment,'' Taylor said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All5th Circuit Rules Open-Source Code Is Not Property in Tornado Cash Appeal
5 minute readAkin, Baker Botts, Vinson & Elkins Are First Texas Big Law Firms to Match Milbank Bonuses
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250