3 Must-Dos for Conducting Internal Investigations in the #MeToo Era
In the #MeToo era, the energy sector is especially susceptible to harassment claims. In order to minimize liability and do right by their employees, companies must conduct well thought-out and thorough investigations.
October 16, 2018 at 03:38 PM
3 minute read
The energy industry has historically been known as an “old boys' club.”
Of course, the industry has made significant progress in hiring and promoting women. But in the era of #MeToo, the legacy of this gender imbalance has made the sector particularly ripe for harassment claims. Those who feel that they have suffered harassment are already more willing to come forward, and the reputation of the industry – rightly or wrongly – bolsters complainants' perception that the mistreatment they perceive having suffered must be gender-based.
In order to minimize liability and do right by their employees, companies must conduct well thought-out and thorough investigations. With that in mind, here are three must-dos for conducting internal investigations in the #MeToo era:
Determine the potential scope of investigation and the best type of investigator
- Rather than rush into an investigation blind, it's crucial that in-house counsel first determine its potential scope. For instance: How many interviews might there be? How much data will need to be collected? In light of the allegations and players, could the case uncover further wrongdoing, result in litigation, or attract attention from government agencies?
- The higher the risk of these outcomes, the more likely the company should engage external counsel to conduct the investigation.
Collect, preserve, and analyze a broad spectrum of information
- It's not just e-mail anymore. Investigators need to look at phone data, various digital messaging platforms, and, of course, information obtained via in-person witness interviews.
- And don't stop collecting data – individuals may still be communicating about the events while the investigation is ongoing.
Think carefully about your investigation report
- An investigation report can be a critical tool for management to assess the findings and recommendations, and can serve as potential evidence to defend claims of harassment.
- However, attorney-client privilege has to be carefully preserved – be aware that selective, affirmative disclosure in order to gain some sort of advantage could result in an argument that privilege has been waived over the entire report.
Cristina E. Rodriguez is a partner and Jillian C. Beck is a senior associate in the Houston office of Hogan Lovells US LLP. An experienced litigator, Rodriguez handles sensitive internal investigations that involve allegations of harassment, discrimination, fraud, or other violations of law or of company policies. Beck is a trial lawyer who represents clients in a wide-variety of industries, including technology, energy, accounting and finance.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNo Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
5 minute readEnergy Lawyers Field Client Questions as Trump Issues Executive Orders on Industry Funding, Oversight
6 minute readHolland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250