Time Off to Train a Puppy? That's Actually a Thing at Susman Godfrey
Neal Manne, a managing partner of Houston-based litigation firm Susman Godfrey, said the firm's unlimited vacation policy for associates includes time off to train a puppy.
October 16, 2018 at 05:50 PM
4 minute read
Susman Godfrey, the litigation firm that strives to stand out from the Big Law pack when it comes to pay and benefits, just expanded the definition of its unlimited paid vacation policy to include the newfangled concept of “pawternity” leave.
Neal Manne, a managing partner of the Houston-based firm, said that as soon as he read a commentary about the pawternity leave trend in Texas Lawyer on Monday, it was clear to him that the firm already provides that benefit under the firm's unlimited vacation policy for associates.
“We have an unlimited paid vacation leave—as much as anybody wants. It's a vacation policy; It's a pawternity policy; it's an I-want-to-go-to-the-beach policy,” Manne said.
Susman Godfrey, with about 139 lawyers in offices in Houston, Seattle, Los Angeles and New York, has a long tradition of providing top-of-market benefits for its associates. Most recently, the firm adopted a policy providing all associates with unlimited paid parental leave in addition to the unlimited vacation policy. The firm also this year topped the Cravath, Swaine & Moore pay scale for associates with a starting pay of $195,000. And because the point was raised at a partner retreat not long ago that the firm had no mandatory retirement policy, the partners decided to set one: the mandatory retirement age at Susman Godfrey is now 100.
Manne said the firm wants to be “ahead of the class” in all ways, including benefits offered to its associates, who are required to have completed a federal clerkship before starting work at the firm.
“Really our more recent policy is to have unlimited vacation, unlimited paid parental leave. That just wasn't being ahead of the class, it was showing [our associates] we consider them to be professionals and we have confidence in them to act responsibly and to feel very vested in our firm, where eventually they will become partners,” he said.
He explained that associates would not have to seek special approval for a pawternity leave to take care of a sick animal, to train a new puppy or adopt one. The associates would just need to make sure, as they would in all situations when they go on leave, that the people they are working with know about their time off and any client needs.
“We are completely indifferent to whether they are going to take time to hang out on a beach or stay home and take care of a puppy,” he said.
Manne said he knows associates appreciate the firm's generous benefits package, but he doubts that any young lawyer finishing a federal clerkship is going to pick Susman Godfrey just because of a few extra vacation days. Those associates, he said, are instead likely to appreciate the firm's willingness to “break the paradigm” and come up with new approaches to benefits.
On the other hand, Manne doubts clients pay much attention to what benefits the firm provides its associates.
“Clients hiring Susman Godfrey are focused on the fact that we win cases for them,” he said.
Manne said even founding partner Stephen Susman endorses the expansive benefits application to include the so-called pawternity leave. On Monday, Manne said, Susman sent an email to the firm's partners remarking that pawternity leave is a firm benefit he needs to take advantage of, since he has a new puppy.
Susman could not be reached for immediate comment. Manne said he is on a “grandpawternity leave” to train his two-month-old Cavalier King Charles Spaniel named Gus. Susman also has another dog of the same breed named Stella.
“He's taking time off to help Stella with the new puppy,” Manne said.
RELATED STORIES:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSeyfarth Launches Energy Transactions Practice in Houston With Polsinelli Team
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Legal Events for Georgia Lawyers
- 2'There is No Time to Waste': Matt Gaetz Withdraws From AG Nomination
- 3The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 4Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 5In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250