Survey: Corporate Execs Optimistic About M&A Market in 2019
While optimistic about the M&A market, survey respondents said most deals will be valued at $100 million or less.
October 17, 2018 at 12:00 PM
5 minute read
Two-thirds of the corporate executives who participated in Dykema Gossett's 14th annual M&A Outlook Survey expect the M&A market to strengthen over the next 12 months—a big improvement over the last three years when fewer than 40 percent expected an improvement in the market.
In addition, “negative sentiment” about the market dropped to 15 percent this year, after hovering around 20 percent for the last three years.
Jeffrey Gifford, a Dykema partner in San Antonio who worked on the survey and is head of the firm's corporate finance practice group, said the survey results show much more optimism than in the past.
That optimism is likely a result of “solid economic fundamentals” and strong financial markets during this past summer when the survey was conducted, the report said. A third of the respondents said the current U.S. M&A activity is fueled by the availability of capital, and 31 percent attributed it to general U.S. economic conditions.
As in 2017, the corporate executives who participated in the survey expect that small and midmarket M&A — deals valued at $100 million or less — will increase over the next year. For deals valued from $100 million to $1 billion, 41 percent of the respondents expect them to decrease over the next 12 months.
Gifford said much of the forecast for smaller M&A deals in 2019 reflects the number of owners of small and midsize companies deciding that it's a good time to exit the business.
M&A work is not only an important driver of the U.S economy, but it provides work for law firms. According to a recent Thomson Reuters report, U.S.-based M&A increased 50 percent in volume during the first three quarters of the year when compared with the same period in 2017.
Survey respondents said that recent federal fiscal changes will positively impact the M&A market in 2019. A total of 81 percent of respondents see a significant or somewhat positive impact on M&A from the corporate tax cut, and 78 percent see a significant or somewhat positive impact from favorable U.S. repatriation tax rules.
That plays into the optimism, Gifford said.
“When the corporate tax rate drops as much as it did with the tax cut, you suddenly get a big chunk of change you need to do something with. The question is how you go to deploy it,” he said.
The executives expect to see the most M&A activity in 2019 in the automotive, energy and consumer products industry sectors. In last year's survey, the top three industries were health care, technology and energy, in that order.
The political impact
In questions tied to current events, 30 percent of the respondents said that a change to a Democratic majority in the U.S. House of Representatives with the midterm elections would have a “very positive” impact on the M&A market in 2018, while 16 percent said it would have a “very negative” impact. For a similar change to the blue side of the spectrum in the U.S. Senate, 32 percent said a shift in control would have a very positive impact, and 19 percent forecast a very negative impact.
Gifford said it's hard to interpret how much politics plays into how optimistic corporate executive are about the M&A market in 2019.
“My guess is that some are concerned, for example, or have been … about the way the Trump administration has gone about negotiating trade policy. And I think that has concerned a number of people. Maybe they are thinking, well, with a different Congress, maybe some of those things don't happen so easily,” he said.
Gifford said uncertainty is generally bad for business, but despite that, the executives have a positive outlook for M&A during the next year.
In another topical question, this one related to the #MeToo movement, only 28 percent of the respondents said they were involved in a deal in which a “Weinstein Misconduct Clause” was proposed as a seller representation in an acquisition, while 61 percent said they had not. According to the survey report, those clauses “legally vouch for the behavior of the company's leadership.”
Film producer Harvey Weinstein faces criminal charges in connection with alleged sexual misconduct .
Asked about artificial intelligence, only 28 percent of the respondents reported that they have used AI technology for due diligence on a deal.
The survey, conducted in September, is based on participation by 203 U.S. senior executives who are directly involved in M&A in a range of industries including chief executive officers, chief financial officers, and other corporate executives.
FURTHER READING:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAkin, Baker Botts, Vinson & Elkins Are First Texas Big Law Firms to Match Milbank Bonuses
4 minute readAnticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readRevenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250