Stranger Things, Indeed
Friends of mine have been urging me to binge watch the hugely popular Netflix science fiction drama “Stranger Things,” assuming that the show's…
October 29, 2018 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
By John G. Browning
Friends of mine have been urging me to binge watch the hugely popular Netflix science fiction drama “Stranger Things,” assuming that the show's blend of '80s nostalgia, pop culture, and clever writing would appeal to me. But if I want “stranger things,” I don't need to look any further than the legal system. And like any good lawyer, I'm prepared to support my argument with a few exhibits.
Exhibit A: Criminal Calls 911 on Himself
If you're a fugitive from justice, you're not helping your chances of staying “on the lam” if you alert the police to your presence. Yet that's exactly what 53-year-old Jesse Graham did in May when he accidentally dialed 911 from an address in Rochester, New York. Graham, who is wanted on “several charges” in North Carolina, was surprised when Rochester police showed up to the address in response to a 911 hang-up call that originated from that location. He's now being held at the Wayne County Jail awaiting extradition, where his telephone privileges are restricted—which is probably a good thing.
Exhibit B: Another 'D'oh' Moment
Police in Leicester, Connecticut, got some unwitting help from the suspected thief himself in a case involving electronics thefts from a local Walmart. It seems that 55-year-old Dennis Jackson allegedly tried to cover up the anti-theft devices on the items using wads of Play-Doh, the clay substance loved by children everywhere. Unfortunately, in using the Play-Doh, Jackson allegedly left behind something else: a readily identifiable fingerprint pressed into and preserved perfectly by the clay! Jackson, who is also facing criminal charges in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, was swiftly arraigned on four counts of unlawful removal of an anti-theft device. You might also say that he made a lasting impression.
Exhibit C: Best. Work Excuse. Ever.
If you've ever called in sick to work with an unconvincing cough or “Ferris Bueller”-like symptoms, then perhaps you're just not trying hard enough. Perhaps you should “go big” like Indian engineer Rameschandra Fefar. After being served with an official notice from his employers demanding the reason why he had only been at the office a few days out of the past eight months, Fefar replied that he was the 10th incarnation of the Hindu god Vishnu (usually depicted as having four arms and blue skin). Fefar was supposed to be working on a dam project, but instead he was “entering into the fifth dimension to change the global conscience,” a task which prevented him from being “physically present in the office.” Hey, look on the bright side: at least you know he's not the guy heating up fish in the break-room microwave, or eating other people's lunches in the communal refrigerator.
Exhibit D: The Millennial From Hell
In an episode that made national headlines, Mark and Christina Rotondo of Camillus, New York, had to take their son to court to get him to leave the house. Frustrated by son Michael's refusal to move out or get a job after months of pleading with him and offering him financial help with which to fund another place, the Rotondos sent their son a series of eviction notices and ultimately took him to court. On May 22, 2018, in a hearing before State Supreme Court Justice Donald Greenwood, Michael Rotondo refused to address his parents directly and argued that he was entitled to at least six more months under his parents' roof, and that he wasn't “ready” to leave home. Calling the request “outrageous,” Greenwood ordered the 30-year-old to move out. The unusual case grabbed national headlines and made Michael Rotondo the poster child for selfish, entitled millennials everywhere, even as offers of financial assistance and a job at a local restaurant flooded in.
Exhibit E: This Is Why We Have Cavity Searches
Leston Lawrence picked an unusual way to steal from his employer, the Canadian Mint: he smuggled 22 gold “pucks” out of the mint by hiding them (presumably one at a time) up his rectum. But Lawrence was eventually caught with the booty in his booty, after selling 17 of the small ingots at a nearby mall's gold trader. Yet as strange as this theft already was, it got weirder. Lawrence's criminal case was assigned to an Ontario judge named—I can't make this stuff up—Peter Doody. And after his conviction in front of Doody (try to say that without snickering), Lawrence appealed the court's order for him to pay over $190,000 in restitution, arguing that it was excessive since he'd only made about $130,000 on the heist. The court of appeals in Ontario, however, let the restitution amount stay since it wasn't the mint's fault that the price of gold had gone up since the original theft. So, once again, Lawrence wound up taking it in the shorts.
Exhibit F: Judging a Book Author by Her Cover
You might say that Oregon police didn't have to look too hard for suspects in the June 2018 shooting death of Daniel Brophy before arresting his wife, romance novelist Nancy Brophy. After all, the 68-year-old author of such books as “The Wrong Husband” had also written a 2011 essay titled “How to Murder Your Husband.” The essay discusses motives, methods, and even dispenses advice to wives contemplating such an act to be “organized, ruthless, and very clever.” Perhaps it would have been clever not to publish an article called “How to Murder Your Husband” before allegedly murdering one's husband—just sayin'.
Inept fugitives and would-be thieves, aspiring deities, and adult children who require court intervention to leave the nest—these are but a few of my favorite “stranger things.”
John G. Browning is a shareholder at Passman & Jones in Dallas, where he handles a wide variety of civil litigation in state and federal courts.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Virtue Begets Virtue': Tips for Practicing Law (and Living) Ethically
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250