San Antonio Appeals Lawyer Closes Firm to Focus on Pro Bono Immigration Appeals
Timothy Patton, a civil appeals lawyer in San Antonio, closed his practice and started a nonprofit to do immigration appeals.
November 02, 2018 at 05:21 PM
6 minute read
Two years ago, San Antonio appellate lawyer Timothy Patton found himself growing more and more frustrated by what he saw happening to people seeking asylum in the United States. He was appalled that people who had lived here for decades were facing deportation. He was horrified that families were being torn apart. So he decided to act.
“I figured I could sit around and complain—or do something,” he said.
Today, Patton devotes his time to pro bono immigration appeals. He recently gave up his for-profit practice, Timothy Patton P.C., having concluded that he needed to spend his time helping asylum-seekers, refugees and longtime U.S. residents appearing before the Board of Immigration Appeals and in federal appeals courts.
He said that lawyers from Texas and elsewhere have flocked to the Texas/Mexico border region to represent asylum-seekers in immigration court, particularly after the Trump administration instituted a policy this year that separated hundreds of children from their parents after they crossed the Texas border. But Patton said there is a large and clear need for lawyers like him to do immigration appeals.
At age 66 and after 37 years of a successful civil appeals practice, Patton said he can afford to give up income and work for free.
“The significance of what he is doing cannot be diminished in any way. It makes me not only proud of him but proud of the legal profession,” said Catherine Stone, an appellate lawyer in San Antonio and a former Texas appeals court judge who has known Patton for many years.
“Tim Patton is an outstanding lawyer and that he has chosen to completely, basically, shut down his … paying practice and devote his time to people who are truly marginalized is so admirable,” said Stone, now a partner at Langley & Banack in San Antonio. “Marginalized people are getting the cream of the crop in terms of the representation they will get on appeal, because he's at the top.”
Over his long career, Patton mostly handled appeals for the clients of plaintiffs attorneys—the last 18 years as a solo practitioner. But he said that, over the last 18 months, he has learned immigration appellate law on a case-by-case basis, using the appellate skills he honed over many years. ”I've been lucky to have found the only area of law which would allow me to do what I like to do,” he said.
Patton added that, when he decided he no longer wanted to do civil appeals, he had “a kind of epiphany” when he realized he could use his skills to represent clients who really need his pro bono representation.
Patton formed a nonprofit, the Appellate Immigration Project, in March 2017. His wife and daughter are directors, and the nonprofit's only paid employee is Patton's longtime paralegal/secretary/proofreader.
In the beginning, Patton said he funded all of the nonprofit's work, but over the last six months, he has received enough contributions—some from lawyers and judges—to support his pro bono work for the next year-and-a-half.
Patton takes client referrals from the BIA Pro Bono Appeals Project, which is run by the Maryland-based Catholic Legal Immigration Network. His clients have come from Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, the Dominican Republic and the Republic of South Sudan. So far, he has worked on immigration appeals for eight pro bono clients and said he recently took two additional referrals.
The skills Patton polished during his career as an appellate lawyer for the clients of plaintiffs attorneys have proved useful in his immigration work. One recent client, a man from Honduras, sought asylum on the grounds that, like his brother, he would be murdered by the MS-13 gang if forced to return home. A judge awarded him asylum, but the Department of Homeland Security appealed. Patton then stepped in, and the Board of Immigration Appeals agreed with his client, who is now living in the United States.
“It's a pretty good feeling when you win something like that,” Patton said.
Another client, a Sudanese man who had lived legally in the United States for more than 20 years, got into a fight with the boyfriend of an ex-girlfriend and, on the advice of a public defender, pleaded guilty to a criminal charge. Homeland Security used that conviction to seek his deportation, Patton said.
The man appeared in immigration court pro se and convinced a judge that he would be tortured by the government if sent to South Sudan. But the government appealed, and the Board of Immigration Appeals agreed with Homeland Security and ordered him deported. Patton was brought in and filed an appeal before the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. There, the federal prosecutor agreed that the Bureau of Immigration Appeals ruled improperly, and the appeals court remanded the case.
Patton's clients are in detention in various locations, and he communicates with them by phone and in writing. He said he speaks passable Spanish and writes better so can largely communicate with his Spanish-speaking clients.
The BIO Pro Bono Appeals Project has reviewed more than 7,200 appeals cases since it was created in 2001 and distributes appeals to a roster of about 440 lawyers, including Patton. According to the nonprofit, 46 percent of cases handled in the most recent quarter had a positive outcome.
Patton said his decision to do pro bono immigration appeals exclusively is not related to politics. He is a Democrat, but his interest in the area comes from his work on the plaintiffs side.
“I spent my entire career representing individuals, for the most part, and helping them fight fights against people who very often were wealthier and had more funding and support systems,” he said.
For him, immigration cases are always so personal, and the facts are compelling.
“My view on doing appellate work has always been that you win by telling the better story, he said. “And what's enjoyable about this type of work is you always have a good story.”
Further Reading:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBakerHostetler Team Get $1.6M Verdict Against Jailers Who Assaulted Inmate
5 minute readWave of Office Closures Highlights the Weighty Stakes Surrounding Law Firm Growth
7 minute readAm Law 50's Runaway Rates Put Onus on Legal Departments to Stiffen Resistance
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250