Transgender Woman Sues Dallas Sheriff, Claiming Forced Exposure During Jail Booking
A transgender woman has filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against several officials with the Dallas County Sheriff's Department after she was allegedly forced to expose her genitals while being booked in to jail and on two other occasions housed with male inmates.
November 06, 2018 at 03:15 PM
4 minute read
A transgender woman has filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against several officials with the Dallas County Sheriff's Department after she was allegedly forced to expose her genitals while being booked in to jail and on two other occasions housed with male inmates.
According to the recent complaint filed in a Dallas U.S. District Court, plaintiff Valerie Jackson was born male but lives as a transgender woman and had her gender legally changed to female. Jackson was arrested and brought to Dallas County jail in 2016 after she forgot to remove a firearm from her bag before going to the airport.
The suit claims that, during the booking process, jail employees inquired about Jackson's gender, and she told them she was female. Jackson alleges she was later instructed to pull down her pants and underwear, and when Jackson asked why she needed to do this, she was told, “We need to know if you've had a sex change or not. We need to see if you have a penis or a vagina. We have to protect you. We can't put you with men if you have a vagina.”
Jackson responded that she was not going to pull her pants and underwear down, and that she should not have to prove anything to them if none of the other women in jail had to prove anything, the suit claims. She alleges that an officer later replied, “You are coming up in the system as male. It doesn't matter what you do, it can never be changed.”
Jackson later relented and pulled her pants and underwear down to her knees so the officers could verify her genitalia and gender, she claims. She was later placed with men and was referred to as “Mr. Jackson” by a bailiff when taken to court for a pretrial hearing, according to the suit.
“Ms. Jackson was humiliated every time she encountered a new officer. Each time, they would see her and reference her as a woman, only to be told by whichever officer was escorting her in front of everyone that she was a man,” the complaint alleges. “All Ms. Jackson was able to do was cry as she suffered the worst humiliation of her entire life.”
After being released from custody in 2016, Jackson filed a formal complaint regarding her treatment in the jail.
In 2017, Jackson was arrested for a second time, was taken to jail and was again placed with male inmates. She was forced to shower with men, where one of the male inmates masturbated while staring at her, she claims.
Jackson was arrested for a third time in 2018 and was again placed with male inmates, and was again forced to shower while a male inmate masturbated to her, she claims.
“Ms. Jackson suffered severe mental anguish as a result of the unconstitutional searches and harassment she endured,” according to the complaint, which claims she was subjected to an invasive and unconstitutional search.
“The unconstitutional search to 'observe' her genitals and allegedly to 'determine' Ms. Jackson's gender and the harassment that accompanied her incarceration was objectively unreasonable as it violated Dallas County Sheriff's Office written policy and violated plaintiff's rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.''
The lawsuit names as defendants Lupe Valdez, who served as Dallas County Sheriff from 2005 until January 2018, as well as Marian Brown, who is the current sheriff, among others.
Valdez was the first lesbian and Latina to serve as Dallas sheriff, while Brown is the first African-American woman to hold the job.
Raul Reyna, a spokesman for the Dallas County Sheriff's Office, declined to comment on the pending lawsuit.
Scott Palmer, a Dallas attorney who represents Jackson, noted that the Dallas County Sheriff's Office has a nine-page policy that states its employees “will not exhibit any bias, prejudice, or discriminate against any individual or group, including the transgender/intersex/gender nonconforming community.”
“The problem is the pattern and practice is completely different from the written policy. Either they don't know it, or they are not trained. They were not supposed to do this with this woman,” Palmer said. “She complained about it immediately after it happened. Jail is bad enough, and to be transgender and be humiliated makes it 10 times worse.''
“Failure to train is the hardest thing to prove in civil rights cases,” Palmer added. “But I think we have a really good claim here.''
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhen Police Destroy Property, Is It a 'Taking'? Maybe So, Say Sotomayor, Gorsuch
Environmental Fines: Texas Secures Over $100M From Petrochemical Processor TPC Group
3 minute readTexas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
3 minute readSamsung Flooded With Galaxy Product Patent Lawsuits in Texas Federal Court
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250