Demand, Lawyer Head Count Down at Texas Firms
Demand at Texas firms included in the Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group flash survey dropped by 3.6 percent, the largest decline for any region of the country.
November 15, 2018 at 05:23 PM
4 minute read
Demand at Texas firms declined during the first nine months of the year, a stark contrast to strong demand for the legal industry throughout most of the country.
Demand during the first three quarters of 2018 declined by 3.6 percent at firms headquartered in Texas, compared with a 2.5 percent increase nationally, according to a new flash survey from Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group.
“When we look at Texas results, it's pretty objectively the most challenged region we are tracking,” David Altuna, client adviser and senior vice president at City Private Bank's Law Firm Group, said on Thursday.
Texas is one of only two regions that posted a decline in demand for the first nine months of the year, Altuna said. The other is the Washington, D.C., region, where demand declined by 1.5 percent, he said.
Altuna points out that the overall survey results are based on a sample of 190 firms, but the statistics for Texas are based on nine firms headquartered in the state. The results are affected by the growing number of out-of-state firms that launched offices in Texas during 2018 or expanded their lawyer head counts in the state.
“Firms are looking for growth,” he said. “Texas is a place where firms think they can get that growth.”
He said the Texas region's total demand would be stronger if it included activity in the market by firms headquartered outside of Texas. And the region's relative performance during the nine-month period should not be surprising, he noted. Texas also lagged behind national trends at the half-year mark in most areas tracked by Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group.
The Texas region fared better in some metrics. Blended billing rates at the Texas firms improved by 4.4 percent through the first nine months of the year, which is slightly better than the industry billing growth rate of 4.3 percent. And expenses increased in the Texas region by only 1.6 percent, compared with a 5.9 percent increase for the industry overall during the nine-month period.
Revenue for the Texas firms grew by 2.1 percent for the period, compared with a 6.3 percent industry growth rate nationally. Altuna said that despite the lower demand in Texas, revenue grew because of the strong growth in billing rates and a reduction in lawyer head count.
Lawyer head count declined by 3 percent in Texas during the first nine months of the year, the largest shrinkage among the 11 regions tracked by Citi. This compares to a 1.6 percent increase in head count for the industry overall.
The report confirms the fact that due to the influx of firms into the Lone Star State, and a heated lateral hiring market, legacy Texas firms are losing lawyers in Texas.
“We know there's a war for talent. We think these numbers are giving you an indication of that,” Altuna said.
Another worrisome factor is the lack of inventory growth in Texas, Altuna said. This will be a factor in the fourth-quarter performance for the firms headquartered in Texas. Inventory grew by only 0.6 percent in Texas during the period, Altuna said, due to low demand.
To compensate for that, he said Texas firms will either have to work aggressively to finish work that might normally spill over into 2019 or find a “rush in demand” over the last three months of 2018.
“It's going to be tough,” he said.
Further Reading:
Citi Survey: Revenue, Demand Down at Texas Firms in First Half of 2018
Legal Industry Experiences 3 Quarters of Strong Demand and Revenue Growth
Demand, Revenue Continued to Grow in Third Quarter, Citi Survey Says
What's So Hot About Texas? For Law Firms, Apparently Everything
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSunbelt Law Firms Experienced More Moderate Growth Last Year, Alongside Some Job Cuts and Less Merger Interest
4 minute readOnce the LA Fires Are Extinguished, Expect the Litigation to Unfold for Years
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Evidence Explained: Prevailing Attorney Outlines Successful Defense in Inmate Death Case
- 2The Week in Data Jan. 24: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
- 3The Use of Psychologists as Coaches/Trial Consultants
- 4Could This Be the Era of Client-Centricity?
- 5New York Mayor Adams Attacks Fed Prosecutor's Independence, Appeals to Trump
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250