Demand, Lawyer Head Count Down at Texas Firms
Demand at Texas firms included in the Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group flash survey dropped by 3.6 percent, the largest decline for any region of the country.
November 15, 2018 at 05:23 PM
4 minute read
|
Demand at Texas firms declined during the first nine months of the year, a stark contrast to strong demand for the legal industry throughout most of the country.
Demand during the first three quarters of 2018 declined by 3.6 percent at firms headquartered in Texas, compared with a 2.5 percent increase nationally, according to a new flash survey from Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group.
“When we look at Texas results, it's pretty objectively the most challenged region we are tracking,” David Altuna, client adviser and senior vice president at City Private Bank's Law Firm Group, said on Thursday.
Texas is one of only two regions that posted a decline in demand for the first nine months of the year, Altuna said. The other is the Washington, D.C., region, where demand declined by 1.5 percent, he said.
Altuna points out that the overall survey results are based on a sample of 190 firms, but the statistics for Texas are based on nine firms headquartered in the state. The results are affected by the growing number of out-of-state firms that launched offices in Texas during 2018 or expanded their lawyer head counts in the state.
“Firms are looking for growth,” he said. “Texas is a place where firms think they can get that growth.”
He said the Texas region's total demand would be stronger if it included activity in the market by firms headquartered outside of Texas. And the region's relative performance during the nine-month period should not be surprising, he noted. Texas also lagged behind national trends at the half-year mark in most areas tracked by Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group.
The Texas region fared better in some metrics. Blended billing rates at the Texas firms improved by 4.4 percent through the first nine months of the year, which is slightly better than the industry billing growth rate of 4.3 percent. And expenses increased in the Texas region by only 1.6 percent, compared with a 5.9 percent increase for the industry overall during the nine-month period.
Revenue for the Texas firms grew by 2.1 percent for the period, compared with a 6.3 percent industry growth rate nationally. Altuna said that despite the lower demand in Texas, revenue grew because of the strong growth in billing rates and a reduction in lawyer head count.
Lawyer head count declined by 3 percent in Texas during the first nine months of the year, the largest shrinkage among the 11 regions tracked by Citi. This compares to a 1.6 percent increase in head count for the industry overall.
The report confirms the fact that due to the influx of firms into the Lone Star State, and a heated lateral hiring market, legacy Texas firms are losing lawyers in Texas.
“We know there's a war for talent. We think these numbers are giving you an indication of that,” Altuna said.
Another worrisome factor is the lack of inventory growth in Texas, Altuna said. This will be a factor in the fourth-quarter performance for the firms headquartered in Texas. Inventory grew by only 0.6 percent in Texas during the period, Altuna said, due to low demand.
To compensate for that, he said Texas firms will either have to work aggressively to finish work that might normally spill over into 2019 or find a “rush in demand” over the last three months of 2018.
“It's going to be tough,” he said.
|Further Reading:
Citi Survey: Revenue, Demand Down at Texas Firms in First Half of 2018
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSeyfarth Launches Energy Transactions Practice in Houston With Polsinelli Team
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250