Norton Rose Fulbright Leaps to Top of Firm Ranking for Digital Marketing
The Social Law Firm Index 2018 ranks firms based on how effectively they use Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram and other platforms for business development.
November 20, 2018 at 05:30 PM
4 minute read
Norton Rose Fulbright did the best job of all Am Law 200 firms in its use of digital marketing in 2018, pulling ahead of DLA Piper for the first time since the digital marketing agency Good2bSocial first created its “Social Law Firm Index” in 2013.
In moving to the No. 1 spot, the firm leaped over five firms that ranked ahead of it last year: DLA Piper, Baker McKenzie, Latham & Watkins, White & Case, and McDermott Will & Emery.
This year, DLA Piper ranked second, followed by Baker McKenzie, White & Case, and Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, according to The Social Law Firm Index 2018. In 2017, Orrick ranked 10th.
Guy Alvarez, a founder and chief executive officer of Good2bSocial, said the agency expanded the survey this year from Am Law 100 firms to Am Law 200 firms. He also said Norton Rose has become more aggressive in its use of social media, putting out content on various platforms.
“They don't have a digital marketing strategy. They have a marketing strategy that's aimed at digital,” Alvarez said.
In the survey report, Norton Rose chief marketing and business development officer Nora Shearer said the firm tries to produce content that resonates globally, as the firm has lawyers in more than 50 cities worldwide. For example, the firm's Instagram account includes photos from professionals around the world and the firm also focuses on thought leadership with a global reach, she said.
The index ranks firms on how well they use digital marketing for outreach, engagement and business development. Good2bSocial looks at such platforms as Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook and Instagram, as well as other metrics, to measure the firm's success.
The Social Law Firm Index 2018 also breaks down the firms' performance in other areas.
Norton Rose ranked No. 1 in thought leadership, followed by Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, Proskauer Rose, DLA Piper, and K&L Gates.
Norton Rose also took the top spot for its use of Twitter, followed by Baker McKenzie, Orrick, White & Case, and Cooley.
For LinkedIn, White & Case led the pack, followed by Baker McKenzie, DLA Piper, Norton Rose Fulbright, and Orrick. On Facebook, Nixon Peabody was No. 1, followed by Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, Baker Botts, White & Case, and Sidley Austin.
The five most improved law firms in 2018 were Locke Lord, Adams and Reese, Kirkland & Ellis, Robinson & Cole, and Sidley, according to the report.
Alvarez said the digital arena is becoming more competitive for all firms, and smaller firms can compete digitally if they focus on client-centric content. He also noted that in 2018, firms used more video on social media than in the past, and more are using paid social media because they can then target their audience.
“Client-centric is the key,” he said, noting that this approach is a lot more effective than if a firm writes generally about how great it is.
Characteristics of the worst performers on the index include abandoned social media profiles and missed engagement opportunities, such as failing to promote a blog post on social media channels. Also, firms are using 5 percent fewer hashtags than last year, which is “troublesome” because hashtags on Twitter and on other social media platforms allow people who are not followers to see content, the report said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSeyfarth Launches Energy Transactions Practice in Houston With Polsinelli Team
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Will Trump Be a Boost to Quinn Emanuel's Fortunes in China?
- 2Mayer Brown’s Hong Kong Split to Take Effect
- 3Simpson Thacher Launches in Luxembourg With Hires From A&O Shearman, Clifford Chance
- 4How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 5Big Firms May See 'Uncomfortable Flashbacks' as Cost Pressure Grows
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250