Meet the GC at Apache, Anthony Lannie
The top lawyer at the energy company for nearly 10 years talks with Texas Lawyer about everything from whom he uses for outside counsel to what he may be up to when he's not in the office.
November 30, 2018 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Houston-based Apache Corp., formed in 1954, is an independent energy company that explores for, develops and produces natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids. Apache currently has exploration and production operations in three geographic areas: the United States, Egypt and offshore the United Kingdom in the North Sea. Last year, Apache had worldwide revenues of $6.4 billion, worldwide assets of $21.9 billion and 3,350 employees.
Last August, Apache and Kayne Anderson Acquisition Corp. announced the creation of Altus Midstream Co. Anchored by Apache's gathering, processing and transportation assets at Alpine High, Altus Midstream will be a $3.5 billion publicly traded, pure-play, Permian Basin midstream C-corp. of which Apache will initially own more than 70 percent.
Anthony Lannie serves as executive vice president and general counsel at Apache.
Legal Team
Lannie leads a “lean” team of 22 lawyers, including several lawyers specializing in multiple practice areas, including oil and gas, human resources, labor and employment, litigation, information technology, mergers and acquisitions and corporate/securities law.
The Apache litigation team handled more than 1,200 matters over the last 10 years, while the transactions team completed both U.S.-based transactions and a variety of major international sales and country exits. The deals included M&A, including a public-company acquisition, as well as liquefied natural gas and other global projects. The transactions team navigated a period of unprecedented growth from 2010 to 2012, purchasing $17 billion in assets in four different countries.
Outside Counsel
Lannie said that about half of Apache's legal spend is outsourced but actively managed by in-house lawyers. Specifically, much of the department's litigation involves local or specialized outside counsel, actively managed by in-house counsel.
Nearly all of the employment, banking/financing, real estate marketing and information technology work is handled in-house. As for contracts and deals and operations work, the split is about 80/20 percent, with the lion's share staying in-house.
The firms Lannie likes to use include Texas-based Bracewell, Hunton Andrews Kurth and Susman Godfrey, among others. Internationally, Apache has used a host of outside law firms, including Clifford Chance, Clyde & Co and the London office of Bracewell.
Daily Duties
In addition to actively engaging in key litigation and transactional matters, Lannie, as a member of Apache's executive management team, also spends his time counseling senior management on both legal and business matters.
He described himself as “a hands-on practitioner, often rolling up his sleeves, traveling extensively and leading negotiations with significant value potential for the corporation.”
Route to the Top
Lannie joined Apache as VP and GC in March 2003 and held increasing roles of responsibility, culminating in his appointment as EVP and GC in August 2009.
Prior to joining Apache, he was president of Houston-based Kinder Morgan Power Co. from 2000 through early 2003 and president of Coral Energy Canada in 1999. Lannie was SVP and GC of Coral Energy, an affiliate of Shell Oil Co. and Tejas Gas Corp., from 1995 through 1999, and of Tejas Gas Corp. from 1994 until its combination with Coral Energy in 1998.
He earned his undergraduate and law degrees from Vanderbilt University.
Personal
A Missouri native, Lannie and Donna, his wife of 41 years, live in Houston. They have two children and four grandchildren. He said he enjoys golf, skiing, travel and church.
Last Book
“Thinking, Fast and Slow,” by Daniel Kahneman, who has been cited for the proposition that “humans rely on … mental shortcuts that lead them to arrive at judgments based on only a thin slice of the overall problem … because their brains can't cognitively assess the problem's full scope.”
“As a problem solver always looking for win-win solutions, I found this insight to be most intriguing,” Lannie said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHaynes Boone, Hicks Thomas Get Dismissal of $1.3B Claims in 2022 Freeport LNG Terminal Explosion
3 minute readDLA Piper Sued by 2 Houston Companies, Alleging a 'Fake Lawyer' Represented Them in Argentina
3 minute readEnergy Lawyers Expect Demand for Energy Work to Stay Steady Under Second Trump Administration
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Daniel Habib to Serve as Next Attorney-in-Charge of NY Federal Defender Appeals Unit
- 2Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in the Modern Age of Communications
- 3High-Profile Sidley M&A Partner Heads to Covington
- 4Stars and Gripes: Firms Need a 'Superstar Culture' to Crack the U.S. Market
- 5BCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250