M&A 2019: How Will Oil and Gas Prices Determine the Outlook
At the beginning of 2018, the energy mergers and acquisitions market was poised to be strong and potentially record-breaking based on strengthening…
December 18, 2018 at 01:51 PM
6 minute read
At the beginning of 2018, the energy mergers and acquisitions market was poised to be strong and potentially record-breaking based on strengthening commodity prices after the low price environment of the previous several years. As it turned out, while 2018 may not have been as strong as many had initially hoped, it has been solid, and many basins with little M&A activity over the previous several years were much more active in 2018.
The year can be summarized as a combination of an active market in several basins (not just the Permian basin as in years past), the rise of the mega-deal, failed auction processes, constrained capital markets, and significant fluctuations in commodity prices late in the year.
2019 is sure to be an interesting year. In an industry that is constantly dependent on capital to fund exploration, development, growth and infrastructure needs, M&A will always be an important tool in the toolbox for energy companies. The Permian basin continues to be an area where further consolidation looks likely, and where infrastructure needs will continue to drive M&A activity. As development in other basins becomes more economic with strengthening commodity pricing (especially gas-heavy basins), companies with assets in those basins may look for opportunities to divest in hopes of capitalizing on the higher prices. However, the drop in crude oil prices (especially if prices remain lower for an extended period) may put a damper on M&A activity in oil-heavy plays. Other investors will look for opportunities to capitalize on lower prices. So, as usual, commodity prices will likely be a significant driver of M&A activity in the energy industry in 2019.
As an overview, the volume and value of M&A deals in the first three quarters of 2018 provided a positive and active outlook for 2019, but that was subsequently dampened by fluctuations in commodity prices. This upward trend in M&A deals in the first three quarters appeared to be largely attributed to the view that commodity prices would remain steady or move higher. However, with the drop in crude oil prices in late October/early November 2018 after a nearly four-year high earlier, coupled with a significant increase in natural gas prices during the same period, it remains to be seen what effect this volatility will have on M&A deal trends in 2019. Based on the Dec. 7, 2018, production cut agreed to by OPEC and Russia, crude oil pricing may strengthen or remain steady.
M&A deals for the third quarter of 2018 indicated a strong upward trend, as the number of deals increased more than a third from the prior quarter and the value of the deals increased by almost three-fourths. More significantly, the value of deals increased over 400 percent from the third quarter of 2017 to the third quarter of 2018, and the volume of deals decreased during that same time period. A vast majority of deal value in the third quarter of 2018 was in the midstream sector, while upstream deals made up a majority of deal volume according to daily legal and business newspaper, the Journal Record.
Total deal value for 2018 indicates a strong and healthy environment for energy deals in 2019. Looking back on 2018 it is likely that the total value of deals will exceed the total value of deals in 2017. In fact, the over $230 billion total deal value for the first nine months of 2018 is the highest value reported over that same time period in the last decade. Total deal volume did not have the same upward trajectory as deal value. There were close to 150 deals reported in the first three quarters of 2018. With over 200 deals reported in all of 2017, it is unlikely the energy sector will match or surpass that amount by the end of 2018.
The higher value of deals in 2018 compared with 2017 can largely be explained by the rise of megadeals valued at $5 billion and over. This megadeal trend was particularly evident in the third quarter of 2018. Particularly, there were four megadeals with value over $5 billion in the third quarter, according to PwC. Combined, the total value of megadeals announced in the third quarter was just over $100 billion. A major facet of the megadeal trend continues to be the MLP to C-corporation restructurings and MLP simplification in the midstream sub-sector, with about $100 billion in value so far in 2018.
In addition to two restructuring/simplification megadeals with values of approximately $64 billion and $17 billion, respectively, notable 2018 third-quarter megadeals include a major acquisition of assets in the Permian, Eagle Ford and Haynesville basins for $10.5 billion and an all-stock acquisition in the Permian valued just over $9 billion. In terms of deal value in the Permian basin, the previously mentioned third-quarter just over $9 billion deal is a close second to the $9.5 billion deal in the first quarter of 2018, also in an all-stock transaction. These acquisitions highlight a consolidation trend in the Permian basin that may continue into 2019 and beyond. Additionally, we would expect this megadeal trend to continue with additional MLP restructurings and simplifications, as capital markets remain closed and the regulatory backdrop does not appear to be changing in favor of MLPs.
Private equity backed deals made a strong showing in the third quarter of 2018 after a largely downward trend for the first half of the year. Notably, according to PwC, there was a nearly 15 percent increase in total deal volume from the second quarter to the third quarter of 2018, largely in the midstream sub-sector.
In terms of the outlook for 2019 M&A deals, crude oil prices and natural gas prices will have a huge impact. The effect of the current drop in oil prices that occurred in November 2018 will not be fully understood until fourth quarter results are reported in early 2019.
Marc Rose and George Vlahakos are partners at Sidley Austin LLP, advising energy and private equity clients on M&A, joint ventures and other transactional matters. Mr. Rose is based in Dallas and Mr. Vlahakos is in Houston. Leslie Slaughter is an associate in the Energy and Capital Markets practices in Houston.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Virtue Begets Virtue': Tips for Practicing Law (and Living) Ethically
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250