Spending by Texas Legal Departments Increased More Than National Average, Survey Says
The legal departments in Texas companies spent more both on outside and in-house counsel.
December 19, 2018 at 01:56 PM
4 minute read
Total spending by legal departments in Texas increased by 10 percent over the last year— double the national increase of 5 percent, according to HBR Consulting's 2018 Law Department Survey.
The increase in both outside and in-house counsel spending was higher in Texas than nationally, according to the survey. Outside counsel spending increased by 20 percent in Texas over the last year, compared with a smaller 3 percent increase nationally. In-house counsel spending in Texas increased by 7 percent, compared with 3 percent nationally.
“Texas is trending with the national data in terms of where the law departments are investing, but also inside legal spending is up at a healthy level, which shows Texas companies are trying to build internally,” said Lauren Chung, managing director at HBR Consulting.
The 15 Texas companies that participated in the survey — 40 percent are in the oil and gas sector — reported median revenue of $18 billion and legal spending of $31.9 million. For the 208 companies nationally, revenue was a median of $9.5 billion and legal spending came in at a median of $30.6 million. The survey results were published in late November, but Texas results were just available this week.
Demand is up by a greater margin in Texas as well, with 93 percent of the 15 Texas companies reporting that their legal needs increased over the last year, compared with 81 percent of 208 companies nationally.
Chung said the increased spending and demand in Texas is due in part to the mix of companies in the survey.
“If you look at that base, 40 percent of the companies in the Texas region are in the oil and gas sector. There are some industry factors that play in the activity,” she said.
Chung said legal departments were surveyed from April through September. The results cover 2017.
While Texas companies spent more than the national average on outside counsel in total, the average hourly fee they paid outside counsel was lower. Texas legal departments paid an average of $497 an hour to outside counsel. The national average was $530 an hour.
Cost control and management was the top challenge for legal departments in Texas and elsewhere. In Texas, 92 percent of companies identified it as a top challenge, compared with 60 percent of companies nationwide.
To manage outside counsel spending, 100 percent of the Texas legal departments said alternative fee arrangements are the top way to keep costs down, compared with 81 percent of companies nationwide.
Chung said cost control is a concern for all legal departments but may be more of an issue for those in Texas because outside counsel spending is up.
“Texas companies are probably seeing the reality that their spending probably has spiked and they do need to be tighter on cost controls. It's becoming more real perhaps,” she said.
Looking ahead, the vast majority of the Texas legal departments — 93 percent — expect their legal needs to continue to increase over the next year, compared with only 81 percent of companies nationally. Nearly half of the legal departments identified their top priorities as automating routine tasks and increasing the number of in-house lawyers.
In Texas, the top three technologies legal departments plan to consider over the next year or two are legal spend real-time technology, document management and e-signature technology.
Chung suggests the survey results are useful to firms because they help outside counsel understand their clients' priorities. Results also provide a “check” for legal departments when assessing operations and focus, she said.
|Further Reading:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDallas-Based Auto Auction Giant Hires Outsider to Replace Retiring Legal Chief
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'America's Next Top Model' Contestant Says Ye Assaulted Her
- 2LexisNexis Responds to Canadian Professor’s Criticism of Lexis+ AI
- 3'Everything Leaves a Digital Footprint': How to Navigate the Complexities of Internal Investigations
- 4Baker McKenzie Accepts Defeat on Australian Integration With Firm's Asia Practice
- 5PepsiCo's Legal Team Champions Diversity, Wellness, and Mentorship to Shape a Thriving Corporate Culture
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250