Immigration Update: USCIS Announces Proposed Changes to H-1B Program
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) published an advance copy of a proposed rule to make significant changes to the selection process…
December 26, 2018 at 12:40 PM
4 minute read
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) published an advance copy of a proposed rule to make significant changes to the selection process for H-1B cap-subject petitions: (1) to electronically register H-1B cap-subject beneficiaries with USCIS during a designated registration period and (2) reverse the order of selection for H-1B cap beneficiaries with a master's or higher degree from a U.S. institution of higher education in relation to other beneficiaries. What would this mean for employers who file H-1B petitions? Here is a recap of the current process and a look at the proposed adjustments to help you understand how the process would change under the new rules.
The Current Process
The H-1B program allows companies in the United States to temporarily employ foreign workers in specialty occupations that require the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty, or its equivalent. A congressionally mandated annual H-1B cap of 65,000 generally plus 20,000 for workers with master's degree or higher applies to workers seeking H-1B for the first time.
Currently, employers submit complete petitions with fee in April for work that would start in October. When USCIS receives more than enough petitions to reach the cap (accounting for a projected rate of denials), a computer-generated random selection process, or lottery, is used to select the petitions that are counted towards the number of petitions projected as needed to reach the cap. Selected petitions are adjudicated, and all other petitions are rejected.
The Online Preregistration System
According to the proposal, U.S. employers would be able to know if an employee was randomly selected for H-1B processing before filing a Labor Condition Application and full H-1B petition. Employers would register by completing an online form including very limited data about the company, the prospective foreign employee, and the offered position. Employers would file a separate registration for each foreign beneficiary but could file no more than one for any beneficiary.
The registration period would occur at least 14 calendar days before the usual April 1 opening day of cap filing season and would last for at least 14 calendar days. USCIS would select enough to the fill the caps and then select more later if selected employers fail to file timely or become denied, creating the prospect of actually using the full number of slots but potentially with substantial delay for those not initially selected. To try to discourage “gaming” the system, USCIS would have the potential to track how many registrations result in filed petitions and potentially investigate employers who show a pattern of filing registrations for individuals and then failing to submit petitions for registrations selected in the lottery.
This part of the rule is highly controversial and logistically complicated, and USCIS has announced already that it probably could not implement this part for the H-1B cap filing season that is scheduled to start April 1, 2019.
Reversing the Order of Selection
The proposed rule would also change the order in which H-1B petitions are selected. USCIS would include all advanced degree holders in the lottery for the regular cap, and the regular cap lottery would be conducted first. USCIS would then conduct a second lottery if there are enough remaining advanced-degree holders to meet the advanced-degree exemption. Currently USCIS handles the process in reverse of that order. USCIS has indicated that it may implement this part of the proposed rule for the April 2019 process even if it does not implement the proposed change in the registration process.
Employers who wish to pursue H-1B petitions for their employees should begin the planning process now and be prepared to file full H-1B petitions for each candidate under the current process.
Dilnaz Saleem is of counsel in Baker Donelson's Houston office, where she focuses her practice on corporate immigration and employment matters. She can be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNondisparagement Clauses in Divorce: Balancing Family Harmony and Free Speech
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250