After Big Dip in 2017, Oil Patch Bankruptcy Activity Stayed Steady in 2018
A total of 29 oil patch companies—exploration and production companies—filed for bankruptcy in 2018, according to Haynes and Boone's Oil Patch Bankruptcy Monitor.
January 10, 2019 at 09:25 PM
4 minute read
The number of oil patch bankruptcies in 2018 was up slightly from 2017, a new report said, but it still doesn't rival bankruptcy activity from the years before that.
A total of 29 oil patch companies filed for bankruptcy in 2018, following 24 in 2017, according to Haynes and Boone's Energy Bankruptcy Reports. The related legal work has continued to go to big Texas firms, but an increasing number of out-of-state firms are getting in on the action as well.
Houston-based Haynes and Boone, which has tracked oil patch bankruptcies since 2015, reported that a total of 167 oil and gas producers have filed for bankruptcy since 2015, for about $96 billion in debt over the four-year period. In 2018, the 29 filings were valued at $13.3 billion in debt, and the 24 filings in 2017 were valued at $8.5 billion in debt.
Charles Beckham, a restructuring partner at Haynes and Boone in Houston, said the number of bankruptcy filings in 2017 and 2018 reflects the upward trend in commodity prices. However, commodity prices slipped during the fourth quarter of 2018—the price of a barrel of oil dropped 40 percent from October through the end of December—and time will tell if that will translate into more Chapter 11 filings for oil patch companies this year, he said.
“I suspect there will be an increase [in bankruptcy filings] if the commodity prices remain at their current level or go down, but the impact of a dip in commodity prices on the number of bankruptcies is not immediate,” he said.
The price of a barrel of West Texas Intermediate Crude closed at $52.36 on Wednesday.
Beckham said Haynes and Boone lawyers had some role in about half of the 167 oil patch Chapter 11s filed over the last four years.
“All Texas firms that have a significant bankruptcy and restructuring practice on the business side have been very active … since 2015,” he said. “A lot of out-of-state firms have also become very active in the energy bankruptcy space, though they did not have that experience in the past,” he added.
The two biggest oil patch Chapter 11s filed in 2018 were Exco Resources' $3.045 billion bankruptcy, and Fieldwood Energy's $3.343 billion Chapter 11, both filed in bankruptcy court in the Southern District of Texas. According to court filings, firms representing Exco include K&L Gates, Kirkland & Ellis, Foley Gardere and Corral Tran Singh. Weil, Gotshal & Manges represented Fieldwood Energy in its Chapter 11, which closed last year.
Haynes and Boone also monitors oilfield services bankruptcies, reporting 12 filings during 2018 valued at $2.85 billion in aggregate debt. That compares with 40 filings and $35 billion in aggregate debt in 2017. Haynes and Boone tabulated a total of 175 oilfield service company bankruptcies with debt totaling $57.4 billion since 2015, in the updated Oilfield Services Bankruptcy Tracker made public this week.
Separately, Haynes and Boone reports that only 25 midstream companies have filed a Chapter 11 in the United States since 2015 for about $20.4 billion in debt. A midstream company is involved in the gathering, transporting, processing or storing of oil or natural gas.
“The midstream sector has not suffered the same level of distress experienced by E&P or oilfield services companies,” Haynes and Boone wrote in the Midstream Report.
Beckham said he is hopeful that commodity prices will stay high enough to prevent companies that successfully emerged from a Chapter 11 from running into more financial difficulties and being forced to file bankruptcy again.
“You always hope there will not be a Chapter 22, but I suspect there will be some in 2019,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readDLA Piper Sued by 2 Houston Companies, Alleging a 'Fake Lawyer' Represented Them in Argentina
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Ex-Schnader Partner Nears Settlement in Misappropriated Comp Class Action
- 2The Increase in Artificial Intelligence-Related Securities Class Actions
- 3Trump’s DOE Pick Could Spell Trouble for Title IX Enforcement, Higher Ed Funding
- 4Jefferson Doctor Hit With $6.8M Verdict Over Death of 64-Year-Old Cancer Patient
- 5Seven Rules of the Road for Managing Referrals To/From Other Attorneys, Part 1
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250