With Legal Industry Firing on All Cylinders, Texas Firms Lag a Little
Top-line revenue growth for the Texas region trailed all other regions in the Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group 2018 survey, but it's not all bad news for Texas firms.
February 12, 2019 at 05:21 PM
3 minute read
The legal industry posted its best results in a decade in 2018, but the story was somewhat different in Texas, where firms struggled to grow revenue and demand turned down, but still managed to grow profits.
Industrywide, law firms posted strong revenue growth boosted by strength in demand and billing rates, which led to the strongest net income and profits per equity partner since 2007, according to a 2018 report by Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group.
In Texas, revenue growth lagged, due to a decline in overall demand growth, but increases in net income and profits per equity partner were nevertheless strong.
“It's a bit of a mixed story. In top-line growth, Texas continued to struggle. It trailed all regions in revenue growth,” said John Wilmouth, senior client adviser in Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group.
For the 10 Texas-headquartered firms in the survey, revenue grew 1.8 percent in 2018, compared with an industry average of 6.4 percent. Citi based its industrywide results on a total of 191 firms, including Am Law 100, Second Hundred and niche or boutique firms.
Wilmouth said a decline in demand growth was a “big reason” why revenue did not improve much at Texas firms in 2018. Demand was down 3.9 percent in Texas, while the industry as a whole saw demand increase by 2.3 percent. Wilmouth said Texas is only one of two regions that saw a decline in demand in 2018.
“It wasn't one or two firms dragging it down—80 percent of the firms in our database for Texas saw a decline in demand,” he said.
On the positive side, Texas firms improved billing rates by 4.8 percent, which exceeded the national average of 4.3 percent.
Also, Wilmouth notes, Texas firms shortened the collection cycle, which shows how well they converted inventory to cash. That helped boost revenue at Texas firms in 2018, but on the flip side does not bode well for first-quarter collections, he said. He said most regions, unlike Texas, saw a big buildup in inventory at the end of the year.
Firms in Texas reduced their lawyer head count by 4.4 percent in 2018, a likely byproduct of the heated lateral hiring market in Texas, while the industry increased their lawyer head count by 1.4 percent. But, Wilmouth said, one big positive in Texas is that the decline in head count was greater than the decline in demand, so productivity increased in Texas by 1.7 percent, compared with a 1 percent increase for the industry.
Texas was the only region to reduce operating expenses in 2018, despite the cost of associate raises that many firms paid during the second half of 2018. Because they reduced expenses, Texas firms posted a 3.9 percent increase in net income, compared with 6.9 percent for the industry. And Texas firms posted a 10.9 percent increase in profits per equity partner, Wilmouth said.
That 10.9 percent increase in Texas PEP beat a 7.5 percent increase industrywide.
Further Reading:
Inside Law Firms' Best Results in a Decade
Texas Firms Lagged in Revenue, Profit Growth in 2017, But Led in Cutting Expenses
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllO'Melveny, White & Case, Skadden Beef Up in Texas With Energy, Real Estate Lateral Partner Hires
5 minute readChamberlain Hrdlicka Taps a New Leader as Firm Follows Succession Planning Path
3 minute readLaw Firms Are 'Struggling' With Partner Pay Segmentation, as Top Rainmakers Bring In More Revenue
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Considerations for Establishing or Denying a Texas Partnership to Invest in Real Estate
- 2In-House AI Adoption Stalls Despite Rising Business Pressures
- 3Texas Asks Trump DOJ to Reject Housing Enforcement
- 4Ideas We Should Borrow: A Legislative Wishlist for NJ Trusts and Estates
- 5Canadian Private Equity Firms Are Eyeing Tech Sector
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250