With Legal Industry Firing on All Cylinders, Texas Firms Lag a Little
Top-line revenue growth for the Texas region trailed all other regions in the Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group 2018 survey, but it's not all bad news for Texas firms.
February 12, 2019 at 05:21 PM
3 minute read
The legal industry posted its best results in a decade in 2018, but the story was somewhat different in Texas, where firms struggled to grow revenue and demand turned down, but still managed to grow profits.
Industrywide, law firms posted strong revenue growth boosted by strength in demand and billing rates, which led to the strongest net income and profits per equity partner since 2007, according to a 2018 report by Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group.
In Texas, revenue growth lagged, due to a decline in overall demand growth, but increases in net income and profits per equity partner were nevertheless strong.
“It's a bit of a mixed story. In top-line growth, Texas continued to struggle. It trailed all regions in revenue growth,” said John Wilmouth, senior client adviser in Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group.
For the 10 Texas-headquartered firms in the survey, revenue grew 1.8 percent in 2018, compared with an industry average of 6.4 percent. Citi based its industrywide results on a total of 191 firms, including Am Law 100, Second Hundred and niche or boutique firms.
Wilmouth said a decline in demand growth was a “big reason” why revenue did not improve much at Texas firms in 2018. Demand was down 3.9 percent in Texas, while the industry as a whole saw demand increase by 2.3 percent. Wilmouth said Texas is only one of two regions that saw a decline in demand in 2018.
“It wasn't one or two firms dragging it down—80 percent of the firms in our database for Texas saw a decline in demand,” he said.
On the positive side, Texas firms improved billing rates by 4.8 percent, which exceeded the national average of 4.3 percent.
Also, Wilmouth notes, Texas firms shortened the collection cycle, which shows how well they converted inventory to cash. That helped boost revenue at Texas firms in 2018, but on the flip side does not bode well for first-quarter collections, he said. He said most regions, unlike Texas, saw a big buildup in inventory at the end of the year.
Firms in Texas reduced their lawyer head count by 4.4 percent in 2018, a likely byproduct of the heated lateral hiring market in Texas, while the industry increased their lawyer head count by 1.4 percent. But, Wilmouth said, one big positive in Texas is that the decline in head count was greater than the decline in demand, so productivity increased in Texas by 1.7 percent, compared with a 1 percent increase for the industry.
Texas was the only region to reduce operating expenses in 2018, despite the cost of associate raises that many firms paid during the second half of 2018. Because they reduced expenses, Texas firms posted a 3.9 percent increase in net income, compared with 6.9 percent for the industry. And Texas firms posted a 10.9 percent increase in profits per equity partner, Wilmouth said.
That 10.9 percent increase in Texas PEP beat a 7.5 percent increase industrywide.
|Further Reading:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAdvising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
4 minute readHomegrown Texas Law Firms Expanded Outside the Lone Star State in 2024 As Out-of-State Firms Moved In
5 minute readEnergy Lawyers Working in Texas Expect Strong Demand to Continue in 2025 Across Energy Sector
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250