Dallas Jury Hits Honda With $37M Verdict
The jury apportioned 63 percent of the fault to Honda, for a total of $23.7 million. The jury apportioned 32 percent of the fault to the driver, who was not a party to the case, and 5 percent to the plaintiff, 27-year-old Sarah Milburn.
February 15, 2019 at 04:53 PM
4 minute read
A jury in Dallas district court has returned a $37.6 million verdict in a lawsuit filed by a woman who was paralyzed after a crash in a Honda Odyssey minivan.
The verdict came Wednesday, ending a nine-day trial before Judge Tonya Parker. The jury deliberated seven hours over claims of a defect in the third-row middle seat belt.
The jury apportioned 63 percent of the fault to Honda, for a total of $23.7 million. The jury apportioned 32 percent of the fault to the driver, who was not a party to the case, and 5 percent to the plaintiff, 27-year-old Sarah Milburn.
The winning lawyers said the jury finding that Honda is 63 percent responsible puts the company on line for the whole verdict under the comparative apportionment statute of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code 33.013, which says: “Each liable defendant, in addition to his liability, is jointly and severally liable for the damages recoverable by the claimant if the percentage of responsibility attributed to the defendant is greater than 50 percent.”
A spokesman for American Honda Motor Co. said Friday the company is “disappointed with the verdict” and “intends to vigorously appeal.”
Honda was represented by Yesenia Cardenas-Colenso of Bowman & Brooke. She passed along a request for comment to the corporate office.
“The design of the seat belt system for the middle passenger in the third-row seat in the 2011 Odyssey complies with all applicable federal safety standards and is similar in design to virtually all comparable minivans of this vintage,” Honda's spokesman said. “If it had been worn properly in this crash, the plaintiff would have suffered no serious injuries.”
But Milburn's lawyers alleged at trial that the belt was too difficult to wear properly.
The Milburn legal team included Charla Aldous and Brent Walker of Aldous\Walker along with Jim Mitchell of the PayneMitchell Law Group in Dallas.
Milburn's lawyers said the belt is a two-part system requiring passengers to grasp a detachable shoulder strap from the van's ceiling, anchor it to the seat and then pull the belt across and buckle it.
The lawyers said their expert showed the jury independent testing proving that fewer than 10 percent of people unfamiliar with the belt were able to use it properly. Milburn would not have been familiar with it because she was riding in an Uber car. Uber was originally one of the defendants but was dropped. The lawyers would only say the issue was resolved with regard to Uber.
Uber did not have an immediate response to a request for comment.
“What the jury understood is that it's not enough to just equip a car with seat belts. The carmaker also has to make sure people can and will use them safely,” Aldous said in the news release. “Sarah put the seat belt on the same way 50 out of 53 people in our studies did, and wearing it that way was actually more dangerous than having no seat belt at all.”
The complaint said Milburn was 23 at the time of the wreck on Nov. 15, 2015. She was home in Dallas on a break from college at Oklahoma State University, where she was a senior. She had gone out with friends in Uptown Dallas.
“As the night came to a close, Sarah and her friends decided to responsibly not drive their cars, but to get a car service to transport them,” the complaint said. One of her friends used his cellphone to order an Uber pickup.
The complaint said the Uber driver picked up six people in an uninsured van owned by someone else, started speeding and ran a red light. The Honda Odyssey was hit broadside by a pickup truck. The pickup driver was not charged with any wrongdoing. The van rolled over onto its side and top. Milburn suffered a broken neck and was left a quadriplegic, according to her lawyers. They said she has “very limited use” of her arms and hands. She lives with her parents, John and Carolyn Milburn, who provide round-the-clock care and who filed the lawsuit along with her.
The case is Milburn v. American Honda Motor, DC-16-16470, in the 116th Civil District Court in Dallas County.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKelly Hart Secures $27M Trade Secrets Misappropriation Final Judgment in Fort Worth Trial
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Relaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
- 2Reviewing Judge Merchan's Unconditional Discharge
- 3With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 4Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 5Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250