Dallas Jury Hits Honda With $37M Verdict
The jury apportioned 63 percent of the fault to Honda, for a total of $23.7 million. The jury apportioned 32 percent of the fault to the driver, who was not a party to the case, and 5 percent to the plaintiff, 27-year-old Sarah Milburn.
February 15, 2019 at 04:53 PM
4 minute read
A jury in Dallas district court has returned a $37.6 million verdict in a lawsuit filed by a woman who was paralyzed after a crash in a Honda Odyssey minivan.
The verdict came Wednesday, ending a nine-day trial before Judge Tonya Parker. The jury deliberated seven hours over claims of a defect in the third-row middle seat belt.
The jury apportioned 63 percent of the fault to Honda, for a total of $23.7 million. The jury apportioned 32 percent of the fault to the driver, who was not a party to the case, and 5 percent to the plaintiff, 27-year-old Sarah Milburn.
The winning lawyers said the jury finding that Honda is 63 percent responsible puts the company on line for the whole verdict under the comparative apportionment statute of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code 33.013, which says: “Each liable defendant, in addition to his liability, is jointly and severally liable for the damages recoverable by the claimant if the percentage of responsibility attributed to the defendant is greater than 50 percent.”
A spokesman for American Honda Motor Co. said Friday the company is “disappointed with the verdict” and “intends to vigorously appeal.”
Honda was represented by Yesenia Cardenas-Colenso of Bowman & Brooke. She passed along a request for comment to the corporate office.
“The design of the seat belt system for the middle passenger in the third-row seat in the 2011 Odyssey complies with all applicable federal safety standards and is similar in design to virtually all comparable minivans of this vintage,” Honda's spokesman said. “If it had been worn properly in this crash, the plaintiff would have suffered no serious injuries.”
But Milburn's lawyers alleged at trial that the belt was too difficult to wear properly.
The Milburn legal team included Charla Aldous and Brent Walker of Aldous\Walker along with Jim Mitchell of the PayneMitchell Law Group in Dallas.
Milburn's lawyers said the belt is a two-part system requiring passengers to grasp a detachable shoulder strap from the van's ceiling, anchor it to the seat and then pull the belt across and buckle it.
The lawyers said their expert showed the jury independent testing proving that fewer than 10 percent of people unfamiliar with the belt were able to use it properly. Milburn would not have been familiar with it because she was riding in an Uber car. Uber was originally one of the defendants but was dropped. The lawyers would only say the issue was resolved with regard to Uber.
Uber did not have an immediate response to a request for comment.
“What the jury understood is that it's not enough to just equip a car with seat belts. The carmaker also has to make sure people can and will use them safely,” Aldous said in the news release. “Sarah put the seat belt on the same way 50 out of 53 people in our studies did, and wearing it that way was actually more dangerous than having no seat belt at all.”
The complaint said Milburn was 23 at the time of the wreck on Nov. 15, 2015. She was home in Dallas on a break from college at Oklahoma State University, where she was a senior. She had gone out with friends in Uptown Dallas.
“As the night came to a close, Sarah and her friends decided to responsibly not drive their cars, but to get a car service to transport them,” the complaint said. One of her friends used his cellphone to order an Uber pickup.
The complaint said the Uber driver picked up six people in an uninsured van owned by someone else, started speeding and ran a red light. The Honda Odyssey was hit broadside by a pickup truck. The pickup driver was not charged with any wrongdoing. The van rolled over onto its side and top. Milburn suffered a broken neck and was left a quadriplegic, according to her lawyers. They said she has “very limited use” of her arms and hands. She lives with her parents, John and Carolyn Milburn, who provide round-the-clock care and who filed the lawsuit along with her.
The case is Milburn v. American Honda Motor, DC-16-16470, in the 116th Civil District Court in Dallas County.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKelly Hart Secures $27M Trade Secrets Misappropriation Final Judgment in Fort Worth Trial
3 minute readFilm Company Alleges Elon Musk, Tesla Used AI to Mimic 'Blade Runner' Scene
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250