Haynes and Boone Posts Record-Setting 2018 on Modest Gains
Haynes and Boone exceeded $400 million in gross revenue and $1 million in profits per equity partner for the first time in 2018.
February 21, 2019 at 07:26 PM
4 minute read
Haynes and Boone burst through significant financial barriers in 2018 as the firm's gross revenue bested the $400 million mark, profits per equity partner (PEP) topped $1 million, and revenue per lawyer (RPL) shot past the no-longer-elusive $750,000 level.
Timothy Powers, the Dallas-based firm's managing partner, said the record year reflects an effort across the firm of “just staying very disciplined in what we are doing.”
Gross revenue was $408.2 million in 2018, up 2.7 percent compared with $397.5 million in 2017. Net income was $131.5 million, a 3.3 percent improvement from $127.2 million the year before.
PEP came in at $1,002,000, up 4.7 percent from $957,000 the year before. And RPL was $760,000, a 4.1 percent increase from $730,000 in 2017. Powers said the firm had been working for the last three years toward passing the $750,000 RPL mark.
“It was a great year from our perspective. We thought we had a lot of great accomplishments. Productivity and demand did increase across the board,” Powers said.
He pointed to a number of strong practices in 2018 including corporate, M&A, energy, capital funds, finance and real estate. Litigation and appeals picked up in Texas, and lawyers in London had some great arbitration and litigation outcomes, Powers said.
The firm shrunk slightly in 2018, with 537 lawyers on a full-time equivalent basis, down 1.5 percent from 545 in 2017. It had 131 equity partners, down 1.5 percent, or two partners. But the firm had 106 nonequity partners, up 4.9 percent, or five lawyers, from the prior year.
Powers said Haynes and Boone in 2018 focused its lateral hiring on existing strengths in energy, financial services—which also includes real estate and restructuring—technology and private equity, and targeted markets in Houston, London and New York.
The firm is also opportunistically looking at growth in the health care and life sciences industry, and has been successful in hiring lateral partners with that focus in Texas, New York and California, he said. Geographically, he said, the firm remains focused on its home base in Dallas, while also growing on the East Coast and the West Coast to solidify its recognition as a national firm.
“We've done all of that while still increasing all of our revenue numbers, and even as a smaller firm, made significant investments in technology this year—and more coming,” he said.
Also on the expense side, Powers said the associate salary increase that took effect midyear cost the firm about $4 million. He said associates want fulfilling work and a great work environment, but “you have to provide the money to remain competitive.”
Haynes and Boone has 16 offices, but Powers said the firm will soon announce the opening of an office in Charlotte, North Carolina, to serve two of the firm's top 10 clients—Bank of America and Wells Fargo. That location has been on the firm's radar screen for several years, he said.
Powers said 2019 hasn't started as strongly as the firm would like on the demand side, but collections did very well in January, as revenue the firm had expected to receive in 2018 came in after Jan. 1. He said demand may have slipped in early 2019 because of the impact of the federal government shutdown and trade wars.
But Powers is positive about what's ahead.
“Everybody is still talking about a strong second half of the year,” he said. “It's a little bit of a wait-and-see, but people are still very upbeat.”
He said the firm's practice balance is intentionally about 70 percent business and 30 percent litigation and controversy work.
“That's been great while the business cycle is up. We are looking at our litigation and restructuring practices picking up,” he said.
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllActions Speak Louder Than Words: Law Firms Shrink From 'Performative' Statements
6 minute readNorton Rose Lawyers Accused of Accessing Confidential Material in Internal IT Probe
3 minute readPartner Compensation, Billing Rates Are Trending Higher in Dallas Than Houston
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1US Magistrate Judge Embry Kidd Confirmed to 11th Circuit
- 2Shaq Signs $11 Million Settlement to Resolve Astrals Investor Claims
- 3McCormick Consolidates Two Tesla Chancery Cases
- 4Amazon, SpaceX Press Constitutional Challenges to NLRB at 5th Circuit
- 5Schools Win Again: Social Media Fails to Strike Public Nuisance Claims
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250