Lawyers Get Big Bite of $236M Settlement Over Orthodontic Work Coverage
The settlement agreement called for “the Conduent defendants” to pay the state a total of nearly $236 million. That includes more than $212 million for reimbursement and almost $24 million for attorneys' fees, costs and legal expenses.
February 21, 2019 at 02:30 PM
4 minute read
The $236 million settlement this week of a lawsuit with a onetime Xerox subsidiary over Medicaid-paid orthodontic expenses underscores what many parents already know: Braces are expensive.
Lawyers involved said it was the largest single resolution in history for a Medicaid lawsuit filed by the Texas Attorney General's Office. They said the state spent more than $1 billion on orthodontics under the Texas Medicaid program during the same time frame. The trouble is, as Attorney General Ken Paxton noted, the Medicaid program “does not cover braces for cosmetic purposes.”
Paxton sued the companies the state had hired to administer the program, Xerox and its former subsidiaries, including Conduent Inc. Paxton alleged the companies “rubber stamped orthodontic prior authorization requests” without making sure they were reviewed by “qualified clinical personnel” as required. “As a result, expensive, taxpayer-funded orthodontic work was performed on thousands of children who either didn't meet the Medicaid standard for braces or didn't require treatment,” Paxton said.
Paxton and Conduent announced their settlement Tuesday, without any admission of wrongdoing. The settlement agreement called for “the Conduent defendants” to pay the state a total of nearly $236 million. That includes more than $212 million for reimbursement and almost $24 million for attorney fees, costs and legal expenses.
One day later, attorneys for the whistleblowers who sued over the same issues two years ahead of the state asked the court for their share. A joint motion for determination of the relators' share and expenses, attorney fees and costs was filed Wednesday in the 53rd Judicial District Court of Travis County.
The legal team for the relators includes: Rusty Tucker and the Law Office of James R. Tucker in Dallas; Mike Tibbals of Dallas; Ketan Kharod of Guerrero & Whittle in Austin; Charles Siegel and Caitlyn Silhan of Waters & Kraus in Dallas; Daniel Hargrove of the Hargrove Law Firm in San Antonio; and James Moriarty of the Law Office of James Moriarty in Houston. They said in a joint statement that their clients were former employees of dental offices that had provided orthodontic care to children whose families were in the Medicaid program.
“They faced vicious legal attacks in their courageous effort to set the record straight,” the lawyers said. They said the settlement “vindicated” the whistleblowers.
Asked to comment on the settlement, a spokesman for Xerox shared a statement from the company.
“The State of Texas sued several companies, including Conduent and its former parent, Xerox, for alleged losses between 2004 and 2014 related to the day-to-day management of a services contract for Medicaid-covered dental care. The original 2003 contract was between subsidiaries of ACS, Inc. (now Conduent) and the State of Texas and was signed before Xerox acquired ACS in 2010. Xerox was not responsible for performing services under the contracts and was not involved in the management of the contract or the services provided to the State. The parties have now agreed to a settlement whereby Conduent will pay the State over $235.9M. Xerox will not make any payment as part of the settlement.”
Conduent posted a statement on its website.
“All of these allegations relate to the 2004-2014 time period, when the company was owned by predecessor companies. In the settlement agreement, Conduent denied any improper actions occurred during the performance of the two contracts,” the company said.
“We are pleased to put this legacy issue behind us. This settlement provides clarity on the financial impact and we have sufficient liquidity to address it,” Conduent CEO Ashok Vemuri said. “Texas remains an important client for us and we are focused on continuing to bring value to our client and its citizens.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNewsmakers: Former Pioneer Natural Resources Counsel Joins Bracewell’s Dallas Office
Sheppard Mullin Expands in Dallas With 6-Lawyer White Collar Team From Bradley
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250