Ex-Proud Boys Lawyer Van Dyke Suspended Over Threats to Bar Complaint
Jason Lee Van Dyke, the former lawyer for 'Western chauvinist" group Proud Boys, pleaded no contest Tuesday to charges he filed a false a police report.
February 25, 2019 at 07:17 PM
6 minute read
A Texas attorney associated with self-described “Western chauvinist” group Proud Boys, who has a history of threatening critics and legal opponents, was suspended and fined by the state's disciplinary board one week before he was supposed to face a misdemeanor charge of filing a false police report claiming some of his guns were stolen.
Jason Lee Van Dyke of Crossroads, Texas, was scheduled to go before a Texas Disciplinary Commission hearing Friday concerning violent threats he made against another lawyer when he agreed to a consent judgment of a one-year suspension, but he will only be suspended from active practice for three months.
The remaining nine months will be probationary, contingent upon his compliance with terms including that he seek mental health treatment and pays $7,500 in fees and expenses.
Van Dyke was already under a six-month suspension that the commission ordered in December after finding he “threatened to present criminal or disciplinary charges solely to gain an advantage in connection with the civil matter” he was handling.
Van Dyke's recent disciplinary action stems from a nasty dispute with Tom Retzlaff, a Phoenix retiree who is the defendant in a $100 million defamation lawsuit Van Dyke filed in federal court.
Retzlaff, who describes himself as lifelong Republican and avid supporter of President Donald Trump, got crossways with Van Dyke when he contacted the Victoria County District Attorney's Office in 2017 to express concerns about Van Dyke's employment and his connections with Proud Boys.
Proud Boys, the male-only organization founded by Canadian Gavin McInnes, has been accused of advocating violence in pursuit of its political and social activism. According to a report from a Washington state sheriff's department last year, the Federal Bureau of Investigation “characterizes the Proud Boys as an extremist group with ties to white nationalism.”
A former Proud Boys member, Jason Kessler, was involved in organizing the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017 that ended in the death of Heather Heyer, a legal assistant at the Miller Law Group. Heyer was among a group of people protesting the rally.
Proud Boys is designated as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.
“I was concerned because I didn't think it was a good idea to have somebody active in a violent white supremacist organization working as a prosecutor in a state with the largest death-penalty rate in the country,” Retzlaff said.
“I actually believe in about 80 percent of what the Proud Boys believe,” he said. “But I don't believe political and racial violence have any place in this country.”
Retzlaff filed a bar complaint against Van Dyke—whom he describes as a “Nazi and white supremacist”—and notified the Victoria County district attorney about Van Dyke's activities. Van Dyke lost his job as a prosecutor in 2017.
Van Dyke also accused Retzlaff of notifying his employers at a real estate title firm about Van Dyke's Proud Boys affiliation and getting him fired in 2018, which Retzlaff denies.
Last year, Van Dyke sued Retzlaff in federal court in Texas' Eastern District; Retzlaff filed a motion to dismiss under Texas' anti-SLAPP law. The judge ruled that such a motion was not viable in federal court, a ruling that is on appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Last March, Van Dyke emailed Retzlaff and threatened to kill him. Those threats were the subject of last week's disciplinary order.
Van Dyke's trial on Friday concerns statements he made to Oak Point police officers in September concerning some guns he reported stolen but which had apparently never been missing.
Van Dyke entered a plea of no contest Tuesday morning to the misdemeanor charge of filing a false police report in Denton County Criminal Court, and was sentenced to 24 months of probation, 60 hours of community service, and assessed $889 in court costs and fees.
Van Dyke was sentenced under Texas' deferred adjudication statute, which means if he completes the probationary period without violating its terms, the sentence will not be counted as a conviction and he can later ask that the record be sealed.
In an email, Van Dyke reiterated his earlier claims of innocence.
“I did not commit this offense,” Van Dyke said. “The plea was based solely upon my opinion that I was treated inappropriately by the district attorney's office and media coverage of the case made it impossible for me to receive a fair trial.
“My conscience is clear,” he said. “I doubt the arresting officers or district attorneys involved can honestly say the same.”
Van Dyke also faces another charge of obstruction relating to emails he sent Retzlaff in December concerning the bar complaint. According to an arrest warrant, Van Dyke said, “I promise you this motherfucker: If my law career dies, you die with it.”
Another said, “You have destroyed my life, and for that offense, you will pay with your own. That's not a threat. That's a PROMISE motherfucker.”
Van Dyke also is a member of the state bars of Georgia, Colorado and Washington, D.C. Retzlaff said he has filed complaints with all of those bar associations as well.
In an email, Van Dyke said the bar order “had nothing to do with my representation of a client” and “was brought by an extraordinary sick and demented individuals (sic) who has stalked me relentlessly for the past two years. The fact that it ever saw the light of day demonstrates the moral fiber, or lack thereof, of the State Bar of Texas and the Office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel.”
“As for the criminal case,” he said, “my only comment is that I absolutely did not commit the offense for which I am charged and have already passed a polygraph. However, the rulings made in the case thus far and the ongoing reporting of that case have demonstrated to me that I have no likelihood of receive a fair trial despite the fact that I am innocent of this charge. I have instructed my attorneys to proceed accordingly.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEven With New Business Courts, Texas Is a Long Way from Taking Delaware's Corporate Law Mantle
5 minute read'Courts Do Get It Wrong': Legal Experts Discuss State-Law Certification Pros and Cons
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250