Family Law Issues for Entrepreneurs
Family lawyers can help entrepreneurs protect their businesses before marriage, during marriage, and at the time of divorce.
March 04, 2019 at 09:00 AM
6 minute read
Marriage and divorce are both significant personal life events as well as business transactions. A marriage creates a de facto 50-50 partnership in all business ventures from that point until divorce or death. These major life events should be part of any entrepreneur's discussions about risk analysis and asset protection.
Entrepreneurs routinely hire business lawyers for help and advice before, during, and after starting a company to protect their company. However, rarely does that advice involve a discussion of the risks to a business due to marriage or divorce or what steps can be taken to eliminate or limit those risks.
A business is property. Simply put, a business can be community or separate property. If the business interest is community property, then it is subject to division in a divorce. If the business interest is separate property, then it cannot be divided in a divorce.
Having a business characterized as separate property is the best way to protect a business from a divorce. A family lawyer can provide valuable advice on protecting your business before marriage, during marriage, and at the time of divorce.
While characterization of marital property can be complex, hypertechnical, and nuanced, there are some general concepts to be mindful of when thinking about how some of these concepts apply to businesses.
Premarital Business Counseling with a Family Lawyer
One of the best times to consult with a family lawyer about your business is before marriage and far enough in advance of the wedding date (usually three to six months).
Separate property is defined (at least in part) as property that is owned or claimed before marriage. Generally, if a business is formed or incorporated before the date of a marriage, then that business is separate property. Also, if the business has not yet been formed, but is close to that stage, then strategizing early about when and how to get that completed is important.
Moreover, premarital agreements are a phenomenal tool for protecting a business from a divorce. In a premarital agreement, potential spouses can agree on what property will be community and what will be separate. A premarital agreement can also contain other provisions for characterization of property that would not ordinarily apply under Texas law. For example, under Texas law, even if a business is separate property, the income and profits from the business during the marriage would still be community. A premarital agreement can change that as well as many other aspects of marital property law. However, starting the premarital agreement process can take time and should be started well in advance of a wedding date.
Separate Property Maintenance Advice During Marriage
Generally, all property that exists at the time of divorce is presumed to be community property. To rebut the community property presumption, separate property must be proved by “clear and convincing evidence.”
There are a few key concepts in understanding how to prove separate property in Texas: (1) Inception of Title; (2) Mutations; and (3) Tracing. First, inception of title looks at when ownership of the property is rooted in a separate or community property source. Separate property sources include property acquired before marriage, by gift, by inheritance, or as a result of a premarital agreement. Second, mutations occur when separate property is sold or exchanged for other property. There can be multiple mutations of separate property, but mutated separate property is still separate property. Third, while mutated separate property is still separate property, proving it is separate property requires tracing. Tracing is a technique that must be used to trace the mutated separate property back to the original separate property source.
During marriage, claims of separate property can be inadvertently forfeited in a variety of ways. Failing to maintain documentation of separate property and its mutations and commingling separate funds with community funds are two of the common ways people accidentally lose their separate property claims.
For businesses, if there are changes to the entity type or structure during the marriage, then it could result in the company losing separate property characterization. For instance, it may make sense to change the entity type or structure during the marriage for liability protection or tax reasons. But doing this incorrectly could result in the business inadvertently becoming community property. How you fund and paper this type of transition can be crucial. A new entity created during the marriage and funded with community funds will be community property. Discussing these types of transitions with a family lawyer beforehand is imperative.
A postmarital agreement can also be a valuable tool in protecting a business and converting community property into separate property. The requirements for a postmarital agreement are similar to those of a premarital agreement and, in some situations, can provide benefits and protections for both spouses.
Bottom line: Consulting with a family lawyer during the marriage and before major business changes can help ensure that separate property claims are preserved and not unintentionally forfeited.
Family Lawyers at Time of Divorce
At the time of divorce, a good family lawyer can help you identify what is needed to prove a separate property claim, help assemble that information, and help find the right experts to try to put the pieces together to prove the separate property claim. Even if a business is community property, a good family lawyer can help protect your business by developing a trial and settlement strategy geared toward protecting the business. There is no one-size-fits-all solution in these situations, but a good family lawyer can help find the best solution for each set of circumstances.
Ultimately, marriage and divorce can have just as significant an impact on a business as it does on an entrepreneur's personal life. Family lawyers can help entrepreneurs protect their businesses before marriage, during marriage, and at the time of divorce.
Kevin Segler is board-certified family law attorney with KoonsFuller. He can be reached at [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNondisparagement Clauses in Divorce: Balancing Family Harmony and Free Speech
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How ‘Bilateral Tapping’ Can Help with Stress and Anxiety
- 2How Law Firms Can Make Business Services a Performance Champion
- 3'Digital Mindset': Hogan Lovells' New Global Managing Partner for Digitalization
- 4Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Has New York Sentence Pardoned by Trump
- 5Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250