On Modest Revenue Growth, V&E Posts Third Record Year in 2018
Vinson & Elkins' saw gross revenue increase 2.7 percent, while profits per equity partner were up 6.6 percent.
March 08, 2019 at 04:22 PM
5 minute read
Vinson & Elkins posted record results for the third straight year, even as revenue per lawyer (RPL) showed only slight growth, while a smaller partnership enjoyed solid growth in profits per equity partner (PEP).
But Mark Kelly, a partner in Houston who chairs the firm, said he was overall very pleased with the results, because the firm's revenue continued a three-year climb.
“We did well,” Kelly said.
In 2018, V&E's gross revenue hit $747.2 million, up 2.7 percent compared with $727.5 million in 2017, and RPL came in at $1.202 million, an increase of 1.6 percent when compared with $1.183 million the prior year.
Net income declined, at $315.2 million in 2018, a 3.7 percent drop compared with $327.3 million in 2017. But PEP grew 6.6 percent to $2.517 million in 2018, compared with $2.361 million the year before, as the firm had 10.1 percent fewer equity partners.
While V&E did post record revenues for three years running, the 2018 year-over-year growth was not as impressive as in 2017, when revenue increased by 11.3 percent, or in 2016, when revenue came in 4.2 percent higher than the year before.
Kelly said a number of practices logged very strong performance in 2018, but the firm made a significant investment in the private equity and alternative lending space, hiring partners with that focus.
He said the firm's private equity work is in the energy sector, such as representing TPG Capital, a shareholder in Nexeo, in global chemical company Univar of Nexeo for about $2 billion. While the firm is known for its energy-related private equity work, Kelly said, it is also growing the practice in other sectors including infrastructure, transportation and logistics, technology, consulting services and real estate.
Private equity wasn't the only hot practice area in 2018, Kelly said. The firm worked on a number of major M&A projects, both public and private, including its representation of Energy Transfer Partners in its merger with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Energy Transfer Equity. Another was advising RSP Permian when it was acquired by Concho for about $9.5 billion.
Other busy practices, according to Kelly, include finance, international arbitration (which is based in London), appellate, regulatory and restructuring and distressed assets. The firm's litigators are working on a number of lawsuits for upstream energy companies, he said, and defending companies from “shareholder activist” litigation.
“It was quite a year,” Kelly said.
On the downside, Kelly said the energy capital markets practice, particularly with initial public offerings, was “not robust” because of commodity prices. But the firm handled an IPO for New Fortress Energy in early 2019, which could bode well for the practice this year.
|Playing the Long Game
V&E focused on expanding in London, New York and Washington, D.C., in 2019, Kelly said, noting that the firm hired lawyers in practices including private equity, antitrust, finance, funds formation and others.
On the expense side, V&E was the first big Texas firm to announce last summer that it would match the Big Law salary increase that pushed starting salaries to $190,000, plus a $5,000 bonus, for first-year lawyers.
The London and Washington, D.C., offices relocated to new space, he said. The firm also renovated its Dallas office and is planning moves in New York and Houston, he said.
In terms of head count, V&E grew slightly, coming in at 622 lawyers in 2018 on a full-time equivalent basis, up 1.1 percent from 615 in 2017. But the firm's equity partner count was 125, a 10.1 percent decline from 139 the prior year. Kelly said the firm has fewer equity partners mostly because of retirements, although some of those lawyers stayed as counsel.
Kelly said 2019 is shaping up well, with a number of deals in the hopper for private equity, infrastructure and technology clients. While energy capital markets has been slow, the firm's REIT (real estate investment trust) practice—which has lawyers concentrated in Richmond, Washington, D.C., and New York—has been picking up.
Kelly said the the firm's partners have “no appetite today” to be a merger candidate, and the firm plans to continue lateral growth in 2019 through the way it usually does it—by hiring “onesies and twosies.”
But long-range growth is also in V&E's sights, he said. The firm expecting a large class of 130 summer associates this year.
|Read More:
Deal Wrap: Texas Energy Deals Keep Big Firms Busy This Summer
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readDLA Piper Sued by 2 Houston Companies, Alleging a 'Fake Lawyer' Represented Them in Argentina
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1About the Awards: Southeastern Legal Awards Q&A with Regional Managing Editor Michael Marciano
- 2Private Credit Boom: Miami’s Role as a Financial and Litigation Hub
- 3Datasite's Ethics and Compliance Team Drives Transformation
- 4$34M Verdict Shows How 1 Claim Could Ratchet Up Employment Suit
- 5OIG Progress Puts Connecticut in Leadership Position
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250