Ex-Client Sues Houston PI Firm for 'Secret Arrangement' With Other Firm
A Plano woman has sued Houston's Nations Law Firm, alleging she was not informed that Motley Rice would work on her pelvic mesh implant suit.
March 14, 2019 at 07:53 PM
5 minute read
A Plano woman sued Houston personal injury lawyer Howard Nations and his firm, alleging they shorted her on money from her settlement in vaginal mesh litigation and involved another firm without her permission.
Sharyn Joy Teitelbaum alleges in a petition filed Wednesday in state district court in Houston that Nations Law Firm made a “secret arrangement” with South Carolina firm Motley Rice to attempt to settle her lawsuit, without informing her in advance. She also alleges that certain deductions from her settlement were unexpected.
“The deductions included deductions for certain fees and expenses that plaintiff had not agreed to pay, including both unexplained expenses and attorneys' fees that included money for Motley Rice,” Teitelbaum alleges in the petition.
Nations did not immediately return a telephone call seeking comment on the allegations.
Motley Rice, which is not a defendant to Teitelbaum's claims, has settled thousands of transvaginal mesh suits, both for individuals and as settlement counsel working with other firms in multidistrict litigation. The firm did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Cris Feldman, a partner in Feldman & Feldman in Houston who represents Teitelbaum, declined comment on the case.
Teitelbaum brings breach of fiduciary duty and professional negligence causes of action against Nations and his firm, and seeks up to $1 million in damages including actual damages, punitives and fee forfeiture.
As alleged in Teitelbaum v. Nations, Teitelbaum entered into a contract with Nations Law Firm on Oct. 13, 2014, to prosecute all claims arising from medical problems she suffered after receiving a pelvic mesh implant in 2009.
She alleges the contract provided for a 40 percent contingency fee, and of that amount 40 percent would go to Nations Law Firm and 60 percent to Levin Papantonio Thomas Mitchell Rafferty & Proctor, a personal injury firm in Pensacola, Florida. However, after she signed the contract, Teitelbaum alleges, Levin Papantonio notified her that it could not represent her in the litigation, and Nations Law Firm said it would continue to represent her.
“NLF [Nations Law Firm] did not seek or obtain plaintiff's consent to receive any fee other than the 40 percent of the original 40 percent provided for in the attorney-client contract—or a total of 16 percent of any amount collected, as provided in the contract,” she alleges in the petition.
Teitelbaum claims that without her knowing, Nations Law Firm made a “secret arrangement” with Motley Rice to “lump plaintiff's case together with 749 other cases to attempt to negotiate a settlement on behalf of plaintiff and other unidentified clients.”
She alleges the Nations firm did not inform her about its “dealings with Motley Rice.” Only when the firm forwarded her portions of a settlement agreement, in March 2017, did she learn of Motley Rice's involvement, her petition said.
When she asked the firm who Motley Rice was, “a legal assistant vaguely responded that 'There were multiple firms involved in this settlement, and for ease of administration, it goes through one firm (Motley Rice),'” the petition said.
Teitelbaum alleges Nations Law Firm never asked or received her permission to have Motley Rice represent her.
She alleges Nations Law Firm refused to give her the opportunity to review all of the settlement documents, but she “acquiesced” to the firm's “advice and coercion” and signed the settlement agreement.
“When NLF sent plaintiff a settlement check, it was for less than the settlement amount shown in the documents that she had reviewed,” the plaintiff alleges, adding that the settlement disbursement sheet included attorney fees for Motley Rice, an MDL fee assessment and case-specific and general expenses.
“NLF had never before told plaintiff that she would have to pay such expenses, and she did not agree to do so,” she alleges.
Still, Teitelbaum alleges, Nations Law Firm has not fully complied with her request to provide her with a complete copy of the settlement documents and communications it had with Motley Rice about her lawsuit.
The petition alleges that Nations Law Firm breached its duty to Teitelbaum by agreeing to divide fees and then dividing them with Motley Rice without her knowledge or consent; negotiating a global settlement without her informed consent and taking more than the 40 percent of the fees that the contract stated for attorney fees; and deducting “improper expenses” and attorney fees from her settlement money.
Teitelbaum has also accused the defendants of violating several Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readDLA Piper Sued by 2 Houston Companies, Alleging a 'Fake Lawyer' Represented Them in Argentina
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250