Parents Sue Four Seasons, Bartender After Daughter Dies With 0.5 Blood Alcohol
“It appears she would have had to have had something in the neighborhood of 17 alcoholic drinks,” plaintiff counsel Quentin Brogdon said of Autumn Rupkey, who died with a blood alcohol level of nearly 0.5 after her father's birthday party.
March 25, 2019 at 01:42 PM
3 minute read
When she died alone in her hotel room after her father's birthday party, Autumn Rupkey's blood alcohol level was nearly 0.5—more than five times the legal limit in Texas.
“I have never seen a case with a blood alcohol level this high,” said plaintiffs lawyer Quentin Brogdon, who's handled civil dram shop cases for 30 years and prosecuted drunken-driving cases for two years. “It's amazing she was even walking around at the end.”
And now Rupkey's parents, Kevin and Pam Rupkey, allege in the lawsuit that the resort that hosted the birthday party, the Four Seasons Resort and Club Dallas at Las Colinas, and the bartender who served their daughter, who was 29, broke the law by serving her an excessive amount of alcohol. They filed their original petition in Rupkey v. Ex Dallas LLC in Dallas County's 193rd Civil District Court on March 21.
Brogdon, a partner at Crain Lewis Brogdon in Dallas, explained that most people black out when their blood alcohol reaches 0.2, lose consciousness at 0.3, and start dying at 0.4. Autumn Rupkey might have had heightened alcohol tolerance, but there's no defense under the law to have overserved her by that much, he said.
“It appears she would have had to have had something in the neighborhood of 17 alcoholic drinks,” Brogdon said.
The Rupkeys are suing Ex Dallas, which does business as the Four Seasons, and Martin Mora, who is a Four Seasons bartender.
The complaint said the defendants had a duty to monitor and limit the amount of alcohol they served to guests, and ensure they did not overserve. Instead, it claimed they overserved Autumn Rupkey to the point she fell down and had to be taken to her room, where she died later. The defendants should have known she was so intoxicated she was a danger to herself and others, the plaintiffs claimed, adding that these actions amounted to negligence and violated the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code.
“The Saturday evening of the party was supposed to be a dream come true for the Rupkey family—a celebratory evening with close family and friends that would be cherished forever. Instead, defendants' overservice of a lethal amount of alcohol to Autumn Rupkey turned the evening into a nightmare,” said the complaint, noting that from that day, Kevin Rupkey's birthday would also be the anniversary of his daughter's death.
The Rupkeys are suing for dram shop and negligence. They're seeking to recover damages for Autumn Rupkey's mental anguish and physical pain before her death, wrongful death damages for Kevin and Pam Rupkey losing their daughter, exemplary damages against the Four Seasons defendants, costs and pre- and post-judgment interest.
Four Seasons spokeswoman Vail Tolbert emailed a statement saying the hotel sent its deepest sympathies to the Rupkey family for their daughter's tragic loss.
“This matter was thoroughly investigated by the Irving Police Department who in consultation with the Dallas District Attorney's Office, determined there was no wrongdoing on the part of the Four Seasons,” the hotel said in the statement.
According to a Fox4News.com article, hotel staff told police they stopped serving Autumn Rupkey when she showed signs of intoxication.
A telephone number listed in public records for Mora, the bartender, was disconnected.
This story was updated to add comment from the Four Seasons.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'GoodPop, Bad Pop': Hueston Hennigan Files Suit Against Freezer Pop-Maker Alleging False Advertising
$30.7M Verdicts: Lawyers Sway Dallas Jury Against Popeyes Franchisee
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Top Five Florida Settlements of 2024
- 2Black, Hispanic Law Student Enrollment Falls at Top 14 Following End of Affirmative Action, but Mostly Improved at California's Top Schools
- 3Justices Wade Into South Carolina's Medicaid Fight With Planned Parenthood
- 4Fisher & Phillips Elects 25 New Partners In 15 Cities
- 5New York State Bar Outlines 2025 Legislative Priorities, Aiming for Fairness, Equity
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250