2 Texas Lawyers Arrested in Public Corruption Sting
The defendants in the case are John F. Cuellar, a Weslaco lawyer who formerly served as a Weslaco city commissioner, Rio Grande City attorney Daniel Garcia and a nonlawyer, Arturo C. Cuellar Jr., who was a Hidalgo County commissioner.
April 05, 2019 at 06:10 PM
4 minute read
A public corruption sting involving bribes for votes to award multimillion-dollar engineering and construction contracts has netted a Weslaco attorney and a Rio Grande City lawyer, who federal agents arrested Friday.
The defendants in the case are John F. Cuellar, a Weslaco lawyer who formerly served as a Weslaco city commissioner, Rio Grande City attorney Daniel Garcia and a nonlawyer, Arturo C. Cuellar Jr., who was a Hidalgo County commissioner. The Cuellars, who are cousins, each face charges of conspiracy to commit honest services wire fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering, while Garcia faces the money laundering charge.
No one answered the phone at the law offices for John Cuellar and Daniel Garcia Friday afternoon, and Arturo Cuellar didn't immediately return a call seeking comment.
The criminal complaint in United States v. Cuellar, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, alleges that the men committed the crimes from 2008 to 2016 along with someone the complaint calls “Commissioner A,” and two other men, Starr County resident Leonel Lopez Jr.—he's pleaded guilty on a federal bribery charge, according to The Monitor—and Weslaco businessman Ricardo Quintanilla, who faces charges separately.
Edinburg solo Fabian Guerrero, who represents Lopez, declined to comment. Quintanilla's attorney, Jaime Pena of Pena Garza in McAllen, didn't immediately respond to a call or email seeking comment.
The story started in 2004 when a state agency told the city of Weslaco that several of its water treatment facilities violated environmental regulations. The Weslaco City Commission voted in 2007 to issue $28 million in bonds to finance several infrastructure projects, including costly rebuilding and repairs on two water plants. In 2008, the commission hired “Company A,” a large-infrastructure engineering and construction company, to be the construction manager for the bond-funded projects, which gave responsibility for selecting the companies that would perform the actual work. Company A granted to itself contracts for the costly water plant projects.
The complaint alleged that Lopez, the one who's pleaded guilty, said that for payment, he'd ensure that contracts were awarded to that construction management company, and another San Antonio engineering company. Next, Lopez got agreements from Arturo Cuellar and John Cuellar, who said they'd take their official action of voting to approve of the contracts for the two companies. The Cuellars got bribe payments in return, alleged the complaint.
Next, prosecutors alleged the Cuellars knew that Lopez in 2011 worked with Ricardo Quintanilla, a Weslaco businessman, who had convinced “Commissioner A” to take bribes for votes that enriched the two companies by granting them city contracts. Lopez was paying the money and Quintanilla was delivering it to Commissioner A, according to the complaint.
In 2012, a McAlllen engineering company also got in on the action, funneling bribes through Lopez to get the commissioners' votes so the company would receive subcontracts on the water plant work and other city contracts, alleged the complaint.
The complaint lists many official actions that John Cuellar took over the years to advance the scheme, granting contracts to the companies that paid the bribes.
Once, in 2011, John Cuellar and “Commissioner A” even voted that one water plant was an imminent public health and safety threat, a declaration allowing the commission to grant no-bid contracts, according to the court filing. They picked two of the bribe-paying companies afterward, without need for a competitive bidding or qualification process.
There are allegations in the complaint that one of the companies wanted additional funds for its city contract, so it would have extra money to pay the bribes. John Cuellar and “Commissioner A” voted to increase its contract by $2.98 million.
Over the years, the payments added up. The San Antonio engineering company paid out $2.5 million to Lopez, and the McAllen engineering company paid him $1.6 million, prosecutors alleged.
Arturo Cuellar took $1.4 million over the years, and John Cuellar received $405,000, alleged the complaint.
Garcia, the Rio Grande City attorney who also faces charges, came into the scheme in 2012, according to court filings. The complaint alleged he helped Lopez and Arturo Cuellar funnel $90,000 through his Interest on Lawyers Trust Account to send bribe payments to John Cuellar. Garcia helped this way because he wanted Lopez and Arturo Cuellar to help his friend, who is a Houston attorney, find employment. The Houston lawyer in 2014 got a job in the city of Weslaco.
Read the criminal complaint in United States v. Cuellar.
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJury Awards $2M Damages, Attorney Fees, Enforcing Oral Partnership Agreement
4 minute readHolland & Knight Launches Mexican Construction Practice to Advise Nearshoring Clients
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250