UPDATE: Under Bill, Texas Bar Card Would Let Lawyers Skip Courthouse Security Across Texas
Under House Bill 1359, which is getting a public hearing on Monday, any licensed lawyer in Texas would be able to skip courthouse security simply by showing their State Bar of Texas membership cards.
April 08, 2019 at 09:43 AM
4 minute read
Updated at 4:43 p.m.
Rep. Gene Wu, D-Houston, has drastically changed his bill that proposes a statewide attorney card that would allow lawyers to skip long courthouse security lines across the Lone Star State.
Wu presented a committee substitute of his legislation, House Bill 1359, that—unlike the original—wouldn't let a lawyer use his regular State Bar of Texas membership card to bypass court security.
Instead, under the substitute, lawyers would apply with the Texas Bar for a brand new court access card, with the lawyer's photo on it, for use in any of Texas's 254 counties. The Texas Bar would create a committee to accept applications and vet applicants, which would include a criminal history check to be repeated annually for card holders, explained Wu to members of the House Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence Committee on April 8. Lawyers would pay a fee to cover the Texas Bar's costs in issuing the cards, and part of the fee would go back to a lawyer's home county to be spent on court security.
“We're just saying attorneys are trusted individuals. We are already screened by the bar once and continuously monitored by the bar,” Wu said.
Wu noted that some smaller counties already allow lawyers to bypass security simply by showing their normal State Bar card, and his bill would not stop that process. However, many other counties have individualized applications and access cards–which this statewide card would replace.
Representatives of the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association, the Texas Trial Lawyers Association and Texas Lawyers Group testified in favor of the bill, but witnesses from a justice-of-the peace court association and people from court systems in Dallas, Tarrant and Travis counties were opposed.
Read the newest version of HB 1359 here.
Original story from 9:43 a.m.
If a lawyer practicing through Texas wishes to avoid long courthouse security lines, there's a lot of paperwork involved.
Each of the state's 254 counties has its own rules for lawyers to apply for an identification card that lets them skip metal detectors.
There's got to be a better way.
Under House Bill 1359, which is getting a public hearing on Monday, any licensed lawyer in Texas would be able to skip courthouse security simply by showing their State Bar of Texas membership cards.
The bill by Rep. Gene Wu, D-Houston, would do away with the county-specific identification cards that lawyers currently must obtain to get into justice courts, municipal courts, county courts, county courts-at-law or district courts. Their state bar membership card would be all that's required across Texas.
HB 1359 also says that no county would be able to adopt rules or enforce orders that conflicted with the bill's provisions.
State bar president-elect Randy Sorrels campaigned on a promise to institute a statewide courthouse security badge. Last fall, the bar convened a task force to determine how to make it happen. Sorrels told Texas Lawyer at the time that a statewide badge would make it more efficient for lawyers to go to court, and it would save them money that they're currently paying for county-specific IDs, which can add up when a lawyer needs badges in multiple counties.
State bar spokesman Lowell Brown noted that HB 1359 is not part of the bar's legislative agenda.
Monday's hearing before the House Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence Committee begins bright and early at 8 a.m.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJCPenney Seeks Return of More Than $1.1M From Jackson Walker For Bankruptcy Work
3 minute readEx-Appellate Court Judges Launch Boutique Focused on Plaintiffs Appeals
2 minute readO'Melveny, White & Case, Skadden Beef Up in Texas With Energy, Real Estate Lateral Partner Hires
5 minute readChamberlain Hrdlicka Taps a New Leader as Firm Follows Succession Planning Path
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250