Meet the 5 Big Law Attorneys Fighting to Save Texas' Mandatory Bar
Who are the attorneys going to bat to save the mandatory, unified bar? We've pulled together biographies of the defense team on the State Bar of Texas' side in the case "McDonald v. Longley."
April 15, 2019 at 04:00 PM
5 minute read
The State Bar of Texas has tapped the heavy-hitting Texas Big Law firm Vinson & Elkins for representation in a case that claims the bar's mandatory dues, used for alleged political and ideological purposes, are unconstitutional.
There's less than a month left for them to complete the first order of business for the five-lawyer team, which must respond to the plaintiffs' arguments that they deserve to win the case early because the law is on their side and no facts are in dispute.
The lawsuit, McDonald v. Longley, claims it's unconstitutional for the State Bar of Texas to charge the plaintiffs—Tony McDonald, Josh Hammer and Mark Pulliam—mandatory dues and then use the funds for alleged political and ideological purposes. They object to some Texas Bar activities dealing with diversity, undocumented immigrants, LGBTQ issues, lobbying and legal aid. McDonald is one of at least four cases nationwide challenging mandatory bar association dues to last summer's U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Janus v. AFSCME that public-sector nonunion workers cannot be required to pay union dues as a condition of employment.
Previously, State Bar Executive Director Trey Apffel told Texas Lawyer in a statement that the bar would vigorously defend its current structure, arguing that mandatory bar dues are constitutional because the state has an interest in regulating the profession and improving the quality of legal services.
Who are the attorneys going to bat to save the mandatory, unified bar? We've pulled together biographies of the defense team.
Thomas Leatherbury
Texas Lawyer has honored Dallas-based Vinson & Elkins partner Thomas Leatherbury, a leader of the firm's First Amendment practice, for his media law work. Leatherbury is also the firmwide appellate practice group leader, and currently serves as a council member of the State Bar's appellate section. He earned his law degree from Yale Law School in 1979, and then clerked for Judge Robert Hill of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas in Dallas. Leatherbury has worked at Vinson & Elkins since 1992.
Patrick “Pat” Mizell
Vinson & Elkins partner Pat Mizell of Houston is a trial lawyer who handles commercial litigation for both plaintiffs and defendants. His work has earned him spots on the selective trade groups the American College of Trial Lawyers and American Board of Trial Advocates. Mizell earned his law degree from the University of Houston Law Center in 1989. He's worked at Vinson & Elkins his entire career, except for a stint as a judge of the 129th District Court in Harris County from 1995 to 2002.
Deborah “Carly” Milner
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEven With New Business Courts, Texas Is a Long Way from Taking Delaware's Corporate Law Mantle
5 minute read'Courts Do Get It Wrong': Legal Experts Discuss State-Law Certification Pros and Cons
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250