Texas House Passes Life Premium Change Disclosure Bill
The bill author is a former Texas House speaker who saw his own premiums rise 100%.
April 18, 2019 at 05:35 PM
3 minute read
Life InsuranceThe original version of this story was published on Law.com
The Texas House of Representatives today approved a bill that could set new disclosure requirements for issuers of permanent life insurance.
House members passed the bill by a vote of 147 to 0. Two other members were present but did not vote on the bill.
The bill, House Bill 207, would establish disclosure standards that would apply when life insurers make some kinds of changes to some kinds of life policy charges on or after Jan. 1, 2020.
The bill would not apply to individual or group annuity contracts, to credit life insurance, or to bank-owned or corporate-owned life insurance.
The bill would apply to policies, such as universal life (UL) policies and variable universal life policies, with a cash value, death benefits of at least $10,000, and non-guaranteed charges.
If the bill becomes law and is implemented as written, affected insurers would have to:
- Alert customers at least 90 days in advance if they changed the value or length of a policy.
- Provide written notice if they decreased the credited interest rate paid on a policy's accumulated value.
- Provide policyholders with an illustration of charges at least once per year.
House Bill 207 was filed last November by Rep. Tom Craddick, R-Midland, Texas. Craddick is a former Texas House speaker
The Texas House Insurance Committee approved an amended version of the bill in March by an 8-0 vote.
Craddick has introduced life insurance standards legislation before. In 2017, he sponsored House Bill 3370. That bill could have capped some types of life insurance premium increases that were not disclosed at the time of policy issue at 10%.
The History
UL policies are generally structured so that the issuer can increase charges related to mortality protection as well as administrative expenses, even if some or all of the investment returns are guaranteed. In later years, the increases can be dramatic.
The cost-of-insurance increases have discouraged some consumers from keeping their UL policies.
The Texas Association of Life & Health Insurers (TALHI) noted in a recap of the 2017 Texas legislative session that Craddick himself had felt the effects of the increases.
"Former Speaker Craddick had a personal experience with a premium increase of over 100% on a Variable Universal Life policy," according to the TALHI session recap.
The increases have also increased costs for life settlement providers. Some life settlement companies have sued life insurers over UL cost-of-insurance increases that hurt their profit.
The Life Insurance Settlement Association has asked the National Council of Insurance Legislators (NCOIL) to develop a model act for life insurance cost-of-insurance increases.
— Read Dealing With Universal Life Premium Increases, on ThinkAdvisor.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All50 States of New Summer COVID-19 Wave Death Data, Plus D.C.
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250