Five Texas Firms on Am Law 100 Slip in Rankings
Four of the five firms increased gross revenue in 2018, compared with 2017.
April 23, 2019 at 12:30 PM
3 minute read
Four of the five Texas-born firms on the Am Law 100 increased gross revenue in 2018 compared with 2017, but all five dropped at least one spot in the ranking of the nation's 100 largest firms by revenue.
That's hardly surprising, considering total revenue for the Am Law 100 grew by 8 percent in 2018, coming in at a record $98.7 billion, and a number of Big Law firms posted robust improvements in revenue. In comparison, the growth rate in 2017 was 5.5 percent, which was then a record.
Gross revenue declined at only eight of the 100 firms—one of them was Texas firm Baker Botts, which posted a 7.3 percent drop in revenue in 2018, which the firm's former managing partner said was due to less contingency fee revenue than the prior year.
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, Vinson & Elkins, Locke Lord, Haynes and Boone and Baker Botts were on the AmLaw 100 in 2019. The same five Texas firms made the list last year.
Akin Gump took the 30th spot in this year's rankings, with $1.071 million in revenue in 2018, down only one place from 2017.
Vinson & Elkins, with $747.2 million in revenue, was 55th, down from 51st last year, and Baker Botts slipped to 58th, down from 50th last year, with $678.2 million in revenue.
Rounding out the Texas firms, Locke Lord took 72nd with $512.6 million in revenue, down from 67th last year, and Haynes and Boone was 92nd, down from 89th last year, with $408.2 million in revenue.
Akin Gump led in revenue per lawyer among the Texas firms, with RPL of $1.211 million in 2018, followed closely by V&E in 31st place with its $1.202 million RPL. Baker Botts was in 52nd place with $958,000, Locke Lord in 71st with $800,000, and Haynes and Boone took 78th place with $760,000.
V&E took the lead among the Texas firms in profits per equity partner, coming in 28th among the 100 firms, with $2.517 million, followed by Akin Gump at 31st with $2.402 million. Baker Botts was in the 53rd spot, with $1.662 million, followed by Locke Lord in the 73rd position with $1.035 million and Haynes and Boone in 79th, with $1.002 million.
|Read More
The Am Law 100 Reached New Heights, Driven by Nearly Universal Growth
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Texas Social Media Law: Federal Circuit Gives Trial Court Instructions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
