As It Grows, Nolte IP Firm Takes New Perspective on Lawyer Pay
Since 2016, Nolte Intellectual Property Law Group of Houston has opened offices in New York, Palo Alto and Austin.
May 01, 2019 at 09:19 AM
5 minute read
Sometimes, success means taking a pay cut at the top.
Nolte Intellectual Property Law Group has gone from four to 22 lawyers and opened three new offices in less than three years. Alexander Nolte, founder of the small Houston firm, credits the egalitarian compensation system he put in place three years ago.
Nolte said the 22 lawyers at his firm can make more at Nolte than they would under more traditional compensation systems. Touting that benefit has allowed the firm to expand outside of Houston with offices in New York, Palo Alto and Austin, he said.
Nolte said he wanted to “break the mold” when structuring his firm for future growth.
In 2016, when he became the sole equity partner in the firm, Nolte brought together all of the firm's lawyers—there were four at the time—to figure out the future. In two months, they developed a new compensation system and a growth plan, he said.
Before starting the small IP firm in 2009, along with a partner who ultimately left in 2016, Nolte had worked at large Texas firm Haynes and Boone and at IP boutique Patterson + Sheridan. That, and several years of leading his own shop, gave him much food for thought about compensation systems, he said.
Nolte said most firms divvy up income with roughly a third going to overhead, a third to lawyer compensation and a third to equity partner earnings. In contrast, his firm puts equity compensation into a pot with the lawyer compensation, which Nolte said “pushes all of the money to the middle rather than than the top.”
Lawyers at Nolte Intellectual Property Law Group earn roughly 60 percent of the income from work they bring to the firm—if they also do that work, he said. If another lawyer does the work, the originating lawyer earns 10 percent, he said.
As the only equity partner, Nolte said he's personally making a little less under the new compensation plan than he was previously—he bills about $700,000 of work a year—but the firm gets “better people” who are more likely to stay. He said the average lawyer recruit in the past few years had 15 years of experience.
New York lawyer Renee Duff, who joined Nolte as a partner in 2017, said she finds the firm's compensation structure beneficial.
“The way that he looks at the compensation structure, it lends itself to you if you are willing to work hard and go out and do what you need to do. Your options are kind of unlimited,” she said.
Now at 22 lawyers, Nolte expects to add a few more for a head count of about 30. The firm launched the New York office in May 2017, Palo Alto in June 2018 and Austin three months after that. And it may add more offices this year, he said.
While it's an IP boutique, very little of Nolte's work is patent litigation. Much of the patent prosecution, licensing and trademark work is billed at a flat fee, which is 10 to 20 percent lower than the national average, according to Nolte.
Nolte said his efforts at innovation don't end with the compensation model and fee arrangements.
In April, for example, the firm launched a “volume play” initiative, he said. It is working with a data specialist to identify people who have filed patent applications without lawyer representation, and pitching those individuals.
Duff, who manages Nolte's trademark practice, said she's excited to see how much work that marketing effort will reap.
The trademark laywer said she met Nolte at St. Thomas University School of Law in Florida when they were students and previously operated her own firm for about 11 years. She said she jumped at the opportunity to open a New York office for Nolte because of the firm's innovative mindset and the opportunity to “give a really good, a full, IP experience” to small businesses and entrepreneurs.
The boutique's clients range from individuals to large corporations including many technology and oil and gas companies, Nolte said.
And those clients seem to notice when their counsel is nimble.
Neeraj Bali, an in-house lawyer at Hewlett Packard Enterprise in Houston, said he's worked with Nolte and his firm for more than 10 years, including when he previously worked at Dresser-Rand Group in Houston.
“The firm has a very experienced team that produces very high quality work projects. We like them because they are able to spin up on the technology very quickly, because of their experience and because of their technical backgrounds,” Bali said.
Bali said the firm's rates are “very cost-competitive” and it provides good service, to the extent that Nolte gave Bali his cellphone number in case of questions or issues.
“It's rare that the managing partner will give out his cell number and he answers outside business hours,” Bali said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEnergy Lawyers Field Client Questions as Trump Issues Executive Orders on Industry Funding, Oversight
6 minute readHolland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
3 minute readKirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Corporate Litigator Joins BakerHostetler From Fish & Richardson
- 2E-Discovery Provider Casepoint Merges With Government Software Company OPEXUS
- 3How I Made Partner: 'Focus on Being the Best Advocate for Clients,' Says Lauren Reichardt of Cooley
- 4People in the News—Jan. 27, 2025—Barley Snyder
- 5UK Firm Womble Bond to Roll Out AI Tool Across Whole Firm
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250