Advocacy as Art: Lawyers Must Engage in Issues and Crisis Management
When public relations is stitched into the fabric of the advocacy, the practice can efficiently influence and improve the development of each case or crisis.
May 06, 2019 at 05:48 PM
5 minute read
In today's world of high-stakes litigation, it is not often that the need for effective advocacy is confined to the courtroom. It typically requires advocacy in the court of public opinion.
It is no surprise that businesses, public interest groups and leading entrepreneurs increasingly look to law firms to create multi-dimensional, multi-layered strategies that advocate for them in the public square. Many law firms engineer carefully crafted plans to advance their clients' interests and protect their most valued asset, their brand.
The regulatory arena, legislative environment and news media are all touchstones of effective advocacy in bet-the-business litigation, working in coordination with one another to help clients achieve successful outcomes.
As many clients realize, crafting a public narrative can no longer fall solely under the purview of public relations agencies or a corporation's in-house communications department.
According to recent press reports, the legal community has awakened to the “new” normal: issues and crisis management should be a fundamental component of any high-stakes advocacy plan. There are many advantages for clients when that function is managed by law firms.
The fusion of legal and communications resources can produce more compelling, effective advocacy—enabling clients to favorably posture themselves, mitigate reputational damage and have a voice in the telling of the stories that define them.
What's more, lawyers who manage issues and crisis management are able to help clients gain strategic advantages in their advocacy and recognize improvements in operational efficiencies, including cost-savings.
When communications professionals are deployed within law firms, the resources are more quickly and readily available. They are unencumbered by the drag of expensive “ramp up” periods often required by PR firms—which often renders the messaging “late” and diminishes its effectiveness.
There is also an inherent advantage in having law, media and politics all directed under the umbrella of the attorney-client relationship. The advocacy can be coordinated and responsive— working in alignment with a client's legal objectives, elements of which might not be fully appreciated by a siloed PR firm.
Seeing the Vision
A handful of law firms that were early entrants in the world of crisis management practices—specialized work groups that help clients navigate the media landscape, engage in the regulatory arena and advocate in public forums.
In 2001, we launched our practice group—after outsourcing certain elements of the public relations function during much of our firm's formative years. We often explain that we made the decision because we were driven to do so by the demands of our commercial litigation practice.
In short, we realized that the most significant cases on our docket not only generated media attention, but invited regulatory scrutiny, sparked shareholder inquiries, and were a catalyst for stakeholder engagement. Our clients facing the “all-or-nothing” proposition of bet-the-business litigation often turned to us to navigate them through treacherous waters of news cycle advocacy.
The truth is many CEOs and GCs of major Lone Star corporations—or those from companies with a significant footprint in Texas—know that effective issues and crisis management is key to advancing their interests, managing exposure and positioning their companies for success. They appreciate the importance of public opinion in shaping outcomes, including litigation.
More Than a Call Center
Effective crisis management is about more than media relations. It centers on the ability to assess and manage a client's most critical elements of public exposure. How do clients protect and advance their position, posture themselves for success, and protect their reputational interests? The answer lies in courtroom and public advocacy that works in concert, not conflict.
Public relations is about more than press engagement. It involves projecting your external voice as a gateway into informing and influencing key audiences. That includes customers, employees, shareholders and other influencers who can impact long-term success.
The aim of the lawyers who operate in high-profile cases is to provide advocacy in all forums.
Advocacy is made more successful by ensuring the legal strategy and messaging are consistent. Crisis experts should manage the immediate issue or concern but with a forward-looking vision that helps clients anticipate challenges, leverage long-term opportunities and protect against reputational harm. They need to see the forest and the trees.
With this in mind, we employ former news reporters, crisis experts and lobbyists to help understand the landscapes in which our clients are involved. These professionals can provide strategic counsel not only in connection with high-profile litigation, but also in anticipating and responding to a wide range of reputational concerns.
They understand that the news cycle is in perpetual motion—with websites and social media driving the need for “rapid response” advocacy that is best understood by those who have firsthand experience confronting its demands.
From Competitive Advantage to Competitive Necessity
Having crisis communications skill sets in-house provides law firms with invaluable expertise, perspective, and insight into the analysis of each client's circumstances.
When public relations is stitched into the fabric of the advocacy, the practice can efficiently influence and improve the development of each case or crisis.
Put another way, law firms that operate as issues and crisis managers offer an added level of advocacy—one that is uniquely creative, responsive and influential.
What was once a competitive advantage for firms and their clients is quickly becoming a competitive necessity, as valuable as any other weapon in the attorney's arsenal.
William A. Brewer III is managing partner at Brewer, Attorneys & Counselors, with offices in Dallas. His practice operates at the intersection of law, business and communications. In 2001, Brewer pioneered the development of an Issues & Crisis Management group that specializes in managing reputational issues for a broad range of clients.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Narcissist’s Dilemma: Balancing Power and Inadequacy in Family Law
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump Taps Former Fla. Attorney General for AG
- 2Newsom Names Two Judges to Appellate Courts in San Francisco, Orange County
- 3Biden Has Few Ways to Protect His Environmental Legacy, Say Lawyers, Advocates
- 4UN Treaty Enacting Cybercrime Standards Likely to Face Headwinds in US, Other Countries
- 5Clark Hill Acquires L&E Boutique in Mexico City, Adding 5 Lawyers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250