Porter Hedges Posts Soaring Profits on Steady Head Count
Lawyer counts at Porter Hedges changed little in 2018 compared with 2017, but revenue per lawyer improved by 12.4% and profits per equity partner increased by 20.3%.
May 08, 2019 at 11:45 AM
3 minute read
Outpacing the growth rate of many larger Texas-based firms, Porter Hedges saw revenue increase 9.5% and net income grow by 13.6% in 2018, even as its lawyer count changed little from the year before.
The firm, which has offices in Houston and Oklahoma City, posted gross revenue of $83.8 million in 2018, compared with $76.5 million in 2017, and revenue per lawyer was $838,000, up 12.4% from $746,000 in 2017.
Profits per equity partner burst through the seven-figure mark at $1.013 million, up 20.3% from $843,000 last year. Net income was $34.5 million, compared with $30.3 million the year before.
Changes in lawyer counts did boost those improvements in RPL and PEP, but only slightly. Total lawyer head count dipped a little in 2018, with 100 lawyers on a full-time equivalent basis, compared with 103 in 2018. And the equity partnership included 34 lawyers in 2018, down two from the year before.
The strong financial performance in 2018 comes after less impressive results in 2017, when revenue improved by 1.3% and RPL increased 2.8%, but PEP dropped 7.5%.
Robert Reedy, the firm's managing partner, said Porter Hedges' strategy of concentrating growth on key practice areas is reaping benefits.
“We have made some significant investments in people over the last few years, both laterals and organic growth. It's time for all of that to pay off and it paid off big time in 2018,” said Reedy, who has led Porter Hedges since 2009.
Most of the firm's lateral hires in 2018 were at the associate level, with many of them coming from much larger firms, Reedy said. “That's a big deal for us,” said Reedy, who also noted that four associates were promoted to partner in January 2018 and five this January.
In December 2018, the firm hired lateral real estate partner Tracey Reisman Gerber, who came from Houston's Schlanger, Silver, Barg & Paine.
Asked which practice groups contributed to Porter Hedges' 2018 growth, Reedy said the bankruptcy practice group “performed at a high level” in 2018, noting that Chapter 11 clients include PetroQuest Energy, of Lafayette, Louisiana. Additionally, litigation was very busy, bucking national trends, he said, and transactional practices also did very well.
But Reedy said no single practice area should get all the credit for 2018's strong financials, and while about a third of the firm's revenue comes from litigation, there was no windfall from any single case.
Despite all the activity in the Texas legal market, with out-of-state firms opening offices in the state and high lateral movement, Porter Hedges is staying focused on its strengths in corporate, energy, bankruptcy, litigation, finance, real estate and construction. The middle-market firm also has strong ties to the energy industry and clients benefit from its competitive billing rates, he said.
Despite the active law firm merger market, Reedy said Porter Hedges lawyers intend for the firm to stay independent, particularly with how well 2018 turned out.
As for 2019, Reedy said, “So far, so good.” However, he notes that 2018 results have set a much higher bar to exceed.
“The results speak for themselves. We are very pleased. We are always trying to get better,” he said.
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readDLA Piper Sued by 2 Houston Companies, Alleging a 'Fake Lawyer' Represented Them in Argentina
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250