Houston Immigration Lawyer Charged in Massive Marriage Fraud Sting
Trang Le Nguyen, managing partner in Pham & Nguyen Law Group in Houston, is facing charges of mail fraud, conspiracy to commit mail fraud, obstructing and impeding the due administration of justice, and tampering with a witness.
May 13, 2019 at 12:35 PM
4 minute read
A Houston-area immigration attorney was nabbed in a massive marriage fraud case involving nearly 100 defendants who are facing a total of 206 charges, U.S. Attorney Ryan Patrick of the Southern District of Texas announced Monday.
Trang Le Nguyen, managing partner in Pham & Nguyen Law Group in Houston, is facing charges of obstructing and impeding the due administration of justice, and tampering with a witness, which both could bring maximum sentences of 10 years in prison. She also faces charges of mail fraud and conspiracy to commit mail fraud, which could bring possible 20-year sentences.
Nguyen didn't immediately return a call or email seeking comment.
The May 10 superseding indictment in the case alleged that another defendant, Ashley Yen Nguyen, who is known as “Duyen,” leads a Southwest Houston criminal organization that operates a “large scale marriage fraud scheme” in Texas and Vietnam.
“It creates sham marriages in order to illegally obtain admission and immigrant status for aliens in the United States,” the indictment claimed. “A 'sham' marriage is a marriage that is entered into for the primary purpose of circumventing the immigration laws.”
The scheme involved recruiting U.S. citizens to marry immigrants, who then became eligible for lawful permanent resident status. The immigrants paid between $50,000 and $70,000 for the conspirators to allegedly pair up the couples, create sham marriages—including fake wedding albums—and file false forms with U.S. immigration agencies.
The U.S. Attorney's Office has charged 96 people in the scheme, and has already taken 50 of the defendants into custody. The indictment in the case includes 206 counts total.
“These arrests mark the culmination of a comprehensive year-long multi-agency investigation into one of the largest alleged marriage fraud conspiracies ever documented in the Houston area,” said a statement by Special Agent in Charge Mark Dawson of Immigration and Customs Enforcement's Homeland Security Investigations.
The attorney who's facing charges is also known as Nguyen Le Thien Trang. She's charged with conspiracy to commit mail fraud for allegedly using the post office to send mail as part of the marriage fraud scheme. She also faces a charge of mail fraud for allegedly submitting documents that had forged signatures, false statements under penalty of perjury, and fake addresses, cohabitants and employment verification records.
Nguyen faces a charge of obstructing and impeding the due administration of justice for allegedly obstructing or impeding the federal grand jury on March 26 by telling a party of one of the fraudulent marriages, who was also an informant for law enforcement, to go into hiding, avoid air travel and stop giving information to law enforcement. For the same alleged behavior, Nguyen also faces a charge of tampering with a witness.
Nguyen earned her law degree from South Texas College of Law Houston in December 2010, and became licensed in Texas in 2011, according to her State Bar of Texas profile, which noted she doesn't have any public disciplinary history.
Her profile on her law firm's website said she practices immigration law, and international business and investments. She was the owner and president of Taura Inc., a Houston-based oil and gas importing and exporting business. Nguyen, who is fluent in Vietnamese and English, has been active in charitable work to help Vietnamese children obtain education and health care, her profile said. She's also a host of a legal advice program on a Vietnamese American Networking Television channel.
Read the superseding indictment:
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute readGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readOvertime Rewind: Texas Court Ruling Unravels FLSA Salary Level Increases
4 minute readTrump, ABC News Settle Defamation Lawsuit Before Depositions
Trending Stories
- 1Lawsuits, AI Accuracy and Debt: Legal Tech Companies that Ran Into Trouble in 2024
- 2Preemptive Litigation: A Potential Approach for a Precise Situation
- 3Paxton's 2024 Agenda: Immigration, Climate, Transgender Issues, Social Media, Abortion, Elections
- 4Let’s Hear It One Last Time!: One More Bow for 2024’s Litigators of the Week
- 5Bottoming Out or Merging Up? Law Firms That Shuttered in 2024
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250