Morrson & Foerster (Photo: Jason Doiy/ALM)MoFo Settles Texas Suit Over Billing Practices
The plaintiff companies alleged in a Texas lawsuit that 34 different timekeepers at Morrison & Foerster billed 669 hours over two months at a cost of $484,321.
May 13, 2019 at 04:45 PM
3 minute read
Morrison & Foerster has settled a lawsuit in Texas state court filed by a group of former clients who alleged the firm engaged in “egregious overbilling.”
Houston lawyer Peter Taaffe, who represents the plaintiffs, confirmed Monday that his clients, who sought more than $1.5 million in damages, came to an agreement with Morrison & Foerster in mediation. Terms of the settlement in Synergies v. Morrison & Foerster were not disclosed.
“The parties have come to a mutual settlement and the terms of the settlement are confidential. The plaintiff parties also add that 'Morrison & Foerster provided plaintiffs with valuable legal work, and plaintiffs appreciate its counsel,'” Taaffe, of counsel at The Buzbee Law Firm, said in a written statement.
On May 9, the plaintiffs filed a notice of nonsuit with prejudice as to all of the plaintiffs' claims against Morrison & Foerster.
Tom O'Brien, a partner at Baker Botts in Dallas who represents Morrison & Foerster, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Neither did a spokesman for the firm, which has 17 offices in the U.S., Asia and Europe.
The plaintiffs, including Firestar Diamond International and its owner, jewelry designer Nirav Modi, initially filed a complaint Feb. 13 in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. Before Morrison & Foerster filed a response, the plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed that complaint. They refiled it on Feb. 26 in state district court in Travis County.
In the Travis County petition, the plaintiffs alleged they hired the firm to assist them in winding down companies, but instead of doing the work efficiently and promptly and keeping them informed, the firm concentrated on liquidating assets and transferring money to the firm's client trust account.
“MoFo then expended an exorbitant and excessive amount of time, primarily on matters that had little to do with winding down the entities. In the course of two months, MoFo had 34 different timekeepers bill 669 hours at a cost of $485,321,” the plaintiffs alleged in the petition.
They further alleged that they paid the firm $30,000 in retainers, and the lawyers collected $625,319 that was deposited in the firm's trust account, for a total of $655,319. However, the plaintiffs alleged, the firm “unilaterally decided to pay itself from these funds” leaving only $170,998 in the trust, and it ultimately only returned $117,305 to them.
The plaintiffs, which include Firestar and related companies, maintain a principal place of business in Austin, according to the petition. They also include Synergies Corp., AVD Trading and Firestar Group.
Plaintiff Modi is facing allegations by India's Punjab National Bank of engaging in a bank fraud scheme, reportedly involving at least $1.8 billion, according to news reports.
The plaintiffs brought breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, fraud, breach of contract and theft causes of action against Morrison & Foerster.
Morrison & Foerster had not filed an answer but filed a motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds, arguing that the litigation should be resolved in New York because lawyers in the firm's New York office did the work for the plaintiffs.
|Read More
MoFo Hit With Texas Lawsuit Alleging 'Egregious Overbilling'
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
From ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute read
DLA Piper Sued by 2 Houston Companies, Alleging a 'Fake Lawyer' Represented Them in Argentina
3 minute read
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
