Citi Survey: Homegrown Texas Firms See Demand Decline in Q1
Revenue growth outpaced the national average at Texas firms during the first quarter, but demand lagged.
May 14, 2019 at 04:10 PM
3 minute read
Firms headquartered in Texas outpaced the U.S. legal industry in revenue growth during the first quarter of 2019, but Texas demand declined by a large margin compared with the national average, according to data collected by the Citi Private Bank Law Firm Group.
First quarter revenue reported by the Texas-based firms in Citi's survey was 5.6 % higher than during the first quarter of 2018. That compares with a 4.5% increase nationally.
Demand declined by 4.8% in Texas during the first quarter, compared with the first quarter of 2018, according to the survey. Nationally, Citi reported a decline of 0.3%.
The Texas statistics are derived from nine firms of various sizes and based in Texas that Citi polled for its Q1 Flash Survey. The national sample includes 187 firms, ranging from Am Law 100 firms to niche and boutique firms.
The statistics for Texas don't tell the full story, said David Altuna, a client adviser at Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group. He notes that the Texas group only includes firms based in Texas and does not account for firms based elsewhere but with Texas offices.
“The 4.8 percent decline in demand is not at all indicative of the state of Texas. The state of Texas is seeing an improvement—a good amount of activity—it's just being done by other firms,” Altuna said.
While demand according to the survey was down for Texas firms, Altuna said the Texas firms countered with a strong increase in billing rates, up by 6.1% in the first quarter, compared with a 4.4% increase nationally.
That was a big factor in the Texas increase in revenue growth for the first quarter, he said, along with collections.
However, in less rosy news, Altuna said expenses grew by 9.8% during the quarter in Texas, compared with a 6.5% national increase.
“That's a challenge,” he said, noting that increasing expenses compress the profit margin.
Interestingly, Altuna said, expenses grew in many regions of the country because firms increased their full-time lawyer counts during the first quarter, compared with 2018. But Texas was one of two regions in the country where FTE head count was down, meaning that the higher expenses in Texas are not related to more lawyers, but to firms paying lawyers more.
“That's an indication of the competition, largely driven by associates,” he said. He said that firms are presumably paying more for talent, because the Texas lateral hiring market has been so competitive.
There was very little growth in equity partnerships during the first quarter, with only a 0.2% increase nationally. But the growth rate declined by 2.7% in Texas during the same period.
That could be another marker that homegrown Texas firms lost equity partners to firms based elsewhere during the first quarter, a trend that's accelerated over the last 18 months as more firms have opened offices in Texas.
While results were mixed, the Texas cutout for the first quarter of 2019 had more positive notes than the report a year ago, when revenue and demand in Texas were both down.
Read More:
Law Firm Revenue Rose as Demand Dropped in the First Quarter of 2019
Citi Report: Demand, Revenue Declined at Texas Firms During First Quarter
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJCPenney Seeks Return of More Than $1.1M From Jackson Walker For Bankruptcy Work
3 minute readEx-Appellate Court Judges Launch Boutique Focused on Plaintiffs Appeals
2 minute readO'Melveny, White & Case, Skadden Beef Up in Texas With Energy, Real Estate Lateral Partner Hires
5 minute readChamberlain Hrdlicka Taps a New Leader as Firm Follows Succession Planning Path
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1DOT Moves to Roll Back Emissions Rules, Eliminate DEI Programs
- 2No Injury: Despite Proven Claims, Antitrust Suit Fails
- 3Miami-Dade Litigation Over $1.7 Million Brazilian Sugar Deal Faces Turning Point
- 4Trump Ordered by UK Court to Pay Legal Bill Within 28 Days
- 5$19.1M Verdict: 'Most Accurate Settlement Demand I Ever Made'
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250