Credit: rmcarvalhobsb/Shutterstock.comTech Company Alleges Toyota's Autonomous Driving Features Infringe Its Patents
A new federal complaint alleges that autonomous driving features, such as lane assist and collision avoidance in Toyota, Lexus and Scion vehicles, are infringing on patents owned by American GNC Corp., a California-based technology company.
May 15, 2019 at 05:49 PM
3 minute read
A new federal complaint alleges that autonomous driving features, such as lane assist and collision avoidance in Toyota, Lexus and Scion vehicles, are infringing on patents owned by a California-based technology company.
The plaintiff, American GNC Corp., invents and licenses technologies such as sensors and gyroscopes used in vehicle navigation and collision avoidance systems. It alleges Toyota Motor Corp. and three of its Texas-based subsidiaries are aware that its vehicles are infringing on patents, yet have not entered an agreement to license the technology. The company raised the claims in a May 14 complaint in American GNC v. Toyota Motor, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Marshall.
“We're just trying to help the true inventors of the technology receive compensation for their inventions,” said Alison Richards of the Global IP Law Group in Chicago, who represents American GNC. “Sometimes in the press, American GNC has been called a patent troll. They're not a patent troll. They're a high-technology company that's done a lot of important work for a lot of entities, including NASA and the Department of Defense.”
Three Toyota subsidiaries based in Plano—Toyota Motor North America Inc., Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc. and Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America Inc.—are defendants along with Japan-based Toyota Motor Corp.
“Toyota has not yet been served with this lawsuit so we have no further comment at this time,” Toyota spokeswoman Karen Nielsen said in an email.
The complaint lists three patents on which Toyota allegedly infringed, involving technology used in autonomous vehicle navigation, for proximity warnings when vehicles get near hazards, and involving a microelectromechanical system to produce accurate signals.
The defendants have known about one of the patents since 2006, and became aware of another patent in 2016, the complaint said. Also, a lawyer for American GNC in March 2018 wrote a letter to a group of Toyota's top executives and general counsel to notify them about the three patents and the ways that American GNC was alleging that Toyota infringed on the patents, according to the plaintiff. In reply, a lawyer for Toyota Motor North America allegedly said the company was investigating the assertions, but American GNC said its attorney didn't hear back from the defendants about the results.
“Toyota has continued to infringe and induce the infringement” of the patents, the complaint said.
Some of the Toyota features that the company alleges infringe its patents include a sensor that is useful for navigation and electronic stability control, for example, in preventing rollovers or skidding in turns. Another is a laser cruise control system that can maintain a set distance between the Toyota vehicle, and the vehicle driving in front of it. Also, a lane-departure assist feature, which tells drivers if they're drifting out of their lane and can steer vehicles back to the center. Finally, Amercian GNC alleges infringement from a precollision system, which measures the position of objects in front of the Toyota, and can automatically brake or notify the driver to do so to stop or mitigate frontal collisions.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Film Company Alleges Elon Musk, Tesla Used AI to Mimic 'Blade Runner' Scene
6 minute read
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
