Lawyers Enraged by Alleged Inefficiencies in New Harris County District Clerk's Office
“I've taken a lot of heat from the attorneys, but the citizens of Harris County are very happy,” said Harris County District Clerk Marilyn Burgess. “No matter what you do, you are not going to please everyone.”
May 22, 2019 at 06:23 PM
7 minute read
Many Houston-area attorneys are mad at how new Harris County District Clerk Marilyn Burgess is running her office.
Some say the office an “insane mess,” and “complete nightmare,” and its ineptitude is making lawyers' jobs harder as they spend hours of their time—which amounts to their clients' money—fixing the office's errors. Burgess has faced the firestorm from lawyers on the office's Facebook group, “Harris County District Clerk's Legal Community Connection.”
But Burgess said while the Facebook page has become a landing ground for attorneys to complain, its members represent a small subset of the attorneys her office serves.
“I think it's very partisan,” said Burgess, who ousted former Republican District Clerk Chris Daniel in the November 2018 Democratic sweep, and took office in January. “I think they are a very small percentage of the people we serve on a daily basis. When I am out in the community talking to people, I get nothing but praise for our clerks.”
But lawyers say the clerk's office is rejecting e-filings at high rates for silly reasons, and the issuance of citations is sometimes delayed for weeks, which impacts court proceedings. Lawyers also criticized Burgess for sending invoices to attorneys and firms for long-past-due court costs and fees.
For example, Andrew Bayley, lead attorney for the Bayley Law Firm in Houston, said he received five or six invoices from the clerk's office that totaled about $1,000.
“I can't very well go and expect my client to pay that,” Bayley noted, adding that four of the cases are five or six years old, and another spans back to 2011.
Burgess said she decided to put a pause on billing attorneys directly for past cases, as she consults with other county offices about whether she's allowed to collect from lawyers.
“We heard the attorneys' complaints. We understand their position, that if the case is completed and closed, and they no longer have a relationship with that client, it's hard to go back to them and ask them to pay,” Burgess explained. “We will make the case the attorneys aren't supposed to be the responsible party. It's the client.”
|Serious Errors
There are also some complaints about oddball clerk errors—some very serious.
For example, Houston solo practitioner Rob Clark said that a clerk dismissed his case for want of prosecution without notifying either party. His opposing counsel's legal assistant was on the phone for two hours trying to figure it out.
“The clerk was absolutely a pain in the ass and said it's not her problem; she doesn't know what to tell me; you are going to have to deal with it,” Clark said. “It's just ludicrous.”
Andrea Chan, an attorney at Olson & Olson in Houston, said she represents a government agency in a case against a pro se litigant. A clerk entered Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice Nathan Hecht's bar card number into the case, making it appear that Hecht represented the pro se litigant and had scheduled a hearing on Chan's client's motion for summary judgment. Chan's paralegal spent time calling various courts to figure out what happened.
“Nobody had any explanation for it,” said Chan, who felt frustrated.
Burgess admitted the two examples were clerk errors.
“There are going to be mistakes. We acknowledge that when we make a mistake, we own it. We work on our training and talk to the people who made the mistake. People get written up for these things,” Burgess said.
Attorneys say when Burgess came into office, she eliminated long-time clerks, and that new staff members make errors because they lack training to do their jobs well.
Burgess said in total, 37 people did not continue in their jobs once she assumed office. Among those cuts, Burgess eliminated between 12 and 15 middle-management positions because the office was “top heavy” with “too many bosses.” For the rest, she then met with managers and supervisors to identify low-performing staff, who were replaced by promoting other clerks to higher positions, and then hiring new staff for resulting vacancies. She said she's working to boost on-the-job training for new clerks.
|E-Filings and Citations
Lawyers are frustrated at having to waste time to fix e-filings that the office has rejected.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEven With New Business Courts, Texas Is a Long Way from Taking Delaware's Corporate Law Mantle
5 minute read'Courts Do Get It Wrong': Legal Experts Discuss State-Law Certification Pros and Cons
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 2GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 3'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 4Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
- 5Chief Assistant District Attorney and Litigator Shortlisted for Paulding County Judgeship
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250