University Research Nonprofit Sues Samsung for Patent Infringement
"The technology allows you to build circuitry up like skyscrapers, instead of horizontally," said plaintiffs counsel Brian Melton, who added that the patented method enables a chip to run more powerfully, while also saving battery power.
May 29, 2019 at 02:25 PM
3 minute read
A new lawsuit alleges that Samsung Electronics Co. and three of its subsidiaries are infringing on a patent by using a patented method to manufacture semiconductor devices for computer chips, smartphones and mobile devices.
The plaintiff, STC.UNM, is a research nonprofit connected to the University of New Mexico in Albuquerque, New Mexico, that for 20 years has fostered researchers who received 500 patents related to over 1,700 inventions, said the May 28 original complaint in STC.UNM v. Samsung Electronics. The nonprofit licenses its inventions and reinvests the proceeds into its research and development activities.
STC.UNM sued Samsung Electronics, which is based in the Republic of Korea, and three of its U.S. subsidiaries—Samsung Electronics America Inc. of New York, Samsung Semiconductor Inc. of San Jose, California, and Samsung Austin Semiconductor of Austin, Texas. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants are infringing its patent within the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas by creating, using and selling products that are manufactured using the patented method.
The patent involves “making a heteroepitaxial layer on a seed area,” which describes a process of layering silicon and silicon germanium vertically on a chip, and then etching the surfaces of each layer of material.
Susman Godfrey partner Brian Melton of Houston, who represents the plaintiff, explained that computer chips are so tiny a manufacturer that wants more power in a chip has a limited area to utilize.
“The technology allows you to build circuitry up like skyscrapers, instead of horizontally,” said Melton, who added that the patented method enables a chip to run more powerfully, while also saving battery power. “Our guys in the University of New Mexico invented and patented a special way of doing it, and we allege Samsung is infringing.”
For example, the Samsung Galaxy S7 smartphone contains an infringing chip, he said.
The plaintiff notified the defendants in September 2018 of the alleged infringement and offered to license the technology, but they declined, the complaint said.
Samsung is producing some of the infringing semiconductor devices at its plant in Austin, which is under the control of the other defendants, the complaint alleged.
Samsung also has encouraged its customers, such as Apple Inc., to infringe on the patent by using, selling and importing electronics that contain Samsung semiconductor devices, the plaintiff claimed.
“Defendants' sales engineers and technical marketing staff members interface with defendants' customers and potential customers to obtain 'design wins' (i.e. contracts with customers) to develop and manufacture chips using the infringing processes,” the complaint alleged. “Defendants' sales engineers and technical marketing staff tout the technological and economic benefits of the infringing processes and actively encourage use of the infringing processes to make customers' chips.”
No one from Samsung's press office immediately responded to an email seeking comment.
Read the complaint:
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTexas Court Invalidates SEC’s Dealer Rule, Siding with Crypto Advocates
3 minute readSamsung Flooded With Galaxy Product Patent Lawsuits in Texas Federal Court
Republican Who Might Become FTC's Next Chair Blasts Democratic Commissioners' 'All Mergers Are Bad' Mindset
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 2A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 3Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
- 4State Bar of Georgia Presents Access to Justice Pro Bono Awards
- 5Tips For Creating Holiday Plans That Everyone Can Be Grateful For
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250