University Research Nonprofit Sues Samsung for Patent Infringement
"The technology allows you to build circuitry up like skyscrapers, instead of horizontally," said plaintiffs counsel Brian Melton, who added that the patented method enables a chip to run more powerfully, while also saving battery power.
May 29, 2019 at 02:25 PM
3 minute read
A new lawsuit alleges that Samsung Electronics Co. and three of its subsidiaries are infringing on a patent by using a patented method to manufacture semiconductor devices for computer chips, smartphones and mobile devices.
The plaintiff, STC.UNM, is a research nonprofit connected to the University of New Mexico in Albuquerque, New Mexico, that for 20 years has fostered researchers who received 500 patents related to over 1,700 inventions, said the May 28 original complaint in STC.UNM v. Samsung Electronics. The nonprofit licenses its inventions and reinvests the proceeds into its research and development activities.
STC.UNM sued Samsung Electronics, which is based in the Republic of Korea, and three of its U.S. subsidiaries—Samsung Electronics America Inc. of New York, Samsung Semiconductor Inc. of San Jose, California, and Samsung Austin Semiconductor of Austin, Texas. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants are infringing its patent within the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas by creating, using and selling products that are manufactured using the patented method.
The patent involves “making a heteroepitaxial layer on a seed area,” which describes a process of layering silicon and silicon germanium vertically on a chip, and then etching the surfaces of each layer of material.
Susman Godfrey partner Brian Melton of Houston, who represents the plaintiff, explained that computer chips are so tiny a manufacturer that wants more power in a chip has a limited area to utilize.
“The technology allows you to build circuitry up like skyscrapers, instead of horizontally,” said Melton, who added that the patented method enables a chip to run more powerfully, while also saving battery power. “Our guys in the University of New Mexico invented and patented a special way of doing it, and we allege Samsung is infringing.”
For example, the Samsung Galaxy S7 smartphone contains an infringing chip, he said.
The plaintiff notified the defendants in September 2018 of the alleged infringement and offered to license the technology, but they declined, the complaint said.
Samsung is producing some of the infringing semiconductor devices at its plant in Austin, which is under the control of the other defendants, the complaint alleged.
Samsung also has encouraged its customers, such as Apple Inc., to infringe on the patent by using, selling and importing electronics that contain Samsung semiconductor devices, the plaintiff claimed.
“Defendants' sales engineers and technical marketing staff members interface with defendants' customers and potential customers to obtain 'design wins' (i.e. contracts with customers) to develop and manufacture chips using the infringing processes,” the complaint alleged. “Defendants' sales engineers and technical marketing staff tout the technological and economic benefits of the infringing processes and actively encourage use of the infringing processes to make customers' chips.”
No one from Samsung's press office immediately responded to an email seeking comment.
Read the complaint:
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCrypto Entrepreneur Claims Justice Department’s Software Crackdown Violates US Constitution
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1OCR Issues 'Dear Colleagues' Letter Regarding AI in Medicine
- 2Corporate Litigator Joins BakerHostetler From Fish & Richardson
- 3E-Discovery Provider Casepoint Merges With Government Software Company OPEXUS
- 4How I Made Partner: 'Focus on Being the Best Advocate for Clients,' Says Lauren Reichardt of Cooley
- 5People in the News—Jan. 27, 2025—Barley Snyder
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250