Houston Lawyers Clinch $11.2 Million Verdict for Oil Field Company
“The clients are really blown away,” said Tanya Dugas Dawson, partner in Raley & Bowick in Houston who represented Oilfield Specialties in a suit seeking royalties from Warrior Energy Services Corp. “Both of these guys are in their 70s. They both had worked for this company for 20 years.”
May 31, 2019 at 04:45 PM
4 minute read
A Houston-based oil and gas company won an $11.2 million verdict for royalties wrongly withheld by Warrior Energy Services Corp. for a patented invention that has revolutionized offshore oil and gas drilling.
Oilfield Specialties owns the rights to co-owners Don Umphries and Gabe Williger's invention, WIPER, which solves a problem that offshore drilling companies such as Exxon, Chevron and Anadarko experience when a pipe gets stuck in a hole, said Tanya Dugas Dawson, a partner in Raley & Bowick in Houston who represented Oilfield Specialties. Previously it took 10 days or more to clear a stuck pipe, but the men's invention does the job within 32 hours. The time savings is valuable because it costs $1.5 million a day to operate a rig.
“It's like an insurance policy because 99% of the time, you don't need it, but when you need it, you want to have it,” Dawson said.
The attorney said that Warrior Energy Services Corp., a drilling services company owned by Superior Energy Services, has made $70 million in profit from WIPER in the past nine years.
Oilfield Specialties alleged in a breach-of-contract lawsuit that Warrior, where Umphries works and Williger previously worked, entered employment agreements with both men in 2000. Those agreements provided that if they developed a patentable process or product that the company used in its business, then Warrior would get first exclusive rights to the invention and would pay each man a 25% royalty of gross revenue within 30 days of a customer paying an invoice, according to the May 14 first amended petition in the case, Oilfield Specialties v. Warrior Energy Services, filed in Harris County's 80th District Court.
In 2008, Williger and Umphries formed Oilfield Specialties and assigned it all rights to their patents. Next, Oilfield Specialties invoiced Warrior for the money it owed the men. Warrior made payments for a period of time, but the petition alleged the payments were on net revenue, not gross revenue, as the employment agreements required.
Oilfield Specialties alleged that Warrior hadn't paid the full amount of royalties, because each inventor was supposed to get a 25% royalty on gross revenue, which comes to 50% total, yet Warrior only paid 25% of net revenue. Then in January 2018, Warrior quit paying altogether.
In a May 16 first amended answer, Warrior denied all of the allegations. Among other things, Warrior argued that Umphries and Williger had waived their rights under the contract, that Warrior had satisfied the contract and already paid everything that it owed, and the men were estopped from bringing their lawsuit. Warrior also claimed the plaintiff had failed to mitigate its alleged damages.
Akerman partner Brian Bagley of Houston, who represented Warrior, wrote in an email that the company wouldn't comment until it completed the appeal process.
The parties seated a jury on May 28, and completed the entire trial on May 29, said Dawson. The jury deliberated for one to two hours before returning a verdict.
The jury found unanimously that Warrior failed to comply with the agreement. Jurors determined that Umphries, Williger and Oilfield Specialties had not waived their employment agreements with Warrior, which may have excused Warrior's failure to comply with the agreements. The failure to comply also was not excused by Umphries, Williger and Oilfield Specialties accepting some other type of performance to fully satisfy the agreement's obligations, the jury found.
The jury awarded Oilfield Specialties $11.2 million in damages to compensate Umphries and Williger for Warrior's failure to comply with the employment agreements.
“The clients are really blown away,” Dawson said. “Both of these guys are in their 70s. They both had worked for this company for 20 years.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllO'Melveny, White & Case, Skadden Beef Up in Texas With Energy, Real Estate Lateral Partner Hires
5 minute readIn Novel Oil and Gas Feud, 5th Circuit Gives Choice of Arbitration Venue
4 minute readNo Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
5 minute readEnergy Lawyers Field Client Questions as Trump Issues Executive Orders on Industry Funding, Oversight
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Delaware Supreme Court Names Civil Litigator to Serve as New Chief Disciplinary Counsel
- 2Inside Track: Why Relentless Self-Promoters Need Not Apply for GC Posts
- 3Fresh lawsuit hits Oregon city at the heart of Supreme Court ruling on homeless encampments
- 4Ex-Kline & Specter Associate Drops Lawsuit Against the Firm
- 5Am Law 100 Lateral Partner Hiring Rose in 2024: Report
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250