In litigation connected to the Stanford International Bank, the Texas Supreme Court is considering a question of first impression that could determine if Stanford Bank’s receiver can claw back $79 million from the largest investor of the collapsed Ponzi scheme.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated its January ruling in the case, Janvey v. GMAG, which found that receiver Ralph Janvey could claw back the money from investor Gary Magness. It found Magness couldn’t claim a good-faith defense under the Texas Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act since he was on notice of the fraudulent nature of funds that Stanford Bank transferred to him in 2008.