86th Texas Legislature Passes Bills Related to Cybersecurity
Which bills moved on when the session came to a close May 27.
June 07, 2019 at 11:55 AM
4 minute read
|
Texas Privacy Protection Advisory Council
HB 4390, which creates a Texas Privacy Protection Advisory Council to study privacy laws in Texas, other states and relevant foreign jurisdictions, has been sent to the governor for signature. Composed of members of the Texas House of Representatives, Texas Senate and relevant industry members appointed by the governor, the council will be charged with recommending statutory changes regarding privacy and protection of information to the Legislature. The council will expire Dec. 31, 2020.
It was originally modeled after the California Consumer Privacy Act and would have granted significant privacy rights to Texas residents. Ultimately, Texas—like many other states considering similar legislation this legislative session—decided not to move forward with enacting consumer privacy legislation (for now).
|Updates to Data Beach Notification Statute
HB 4390 also amends the state's preexisting data breach notification statute to require disclosure of a breach of certain computerized personal data to be made “not later than the 60th day after the date on which the person determines the breach occurred.” The statute defines “breach of system security” as the “unauthorized acquisition of computerized data that compromises the security, confidentiality, or integrity of sensitive personal information maintained by a person, including data that is encrypted if the person accessing the data has the key required to decrypt the data.”
The bill also requires the person or entity that owns or licenses the compromised data to notify the Texas attorney general if the breach involved 250 or more state residents. That notice will need to be provided within the same 60-day timeframe for providing notice to residents and must describe the nature of the breach, identify the number of affected residents, explain the measures taken to resolve the breach, and state whether law enforcement is investigating. The breach notification statute already provides the Attorney General's Office with the ability to seek substantial damages for violations of its provisions. Therefore, covered entities will need to ensure that they strictly comply with the statute's requirements.
If it becomes law, the bill will take effect Sept. 1, with the exception of the portion that modifies Section 521.053 of the Texas Business and Commerce Code concerning disclosure requirements, which will take effect Jan. 1, 2020.
|PUC Cybersecurity Monitor
SB 936, which requires the PUC and the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) to contract with an entity to act as the PUC's cybersecurity monitor, has been sent to the governor for signature. The monitor manages a cybersecurity outreach program for utilities, including transmission and distribution utilities, wholesale retailers of electric energy on behalf of river authorities, and certain municipally owned utilities or electric cooperatives that operate inside the ERCOT power region, or operate solely outside of the ERCOT power region and elect to participate in the program. The monitor is to meet regularly with utilities to discuss emerging threats, best business practices, and training opportunities, and would review self-assessments of cybersecurity efforts voluntarily disclosed by utilities. The bill also amends Section 35.213 of the Texas Utilities Code to allow electric utilities to recover reasonable and necessary costs incurred in connection with activities under Section 39.1516. Upon becoming law, the bill will take effect Sept. 1.
|Texas Electric Grid Security Council
SB 475, also sent to the governor for signature and set to take effect immediately upon becoming law, establishes the Texas Electric Grid Security Council as an advisory body to facilitate the development and dissemination of best security practices for the electric industry composed of the PUC commissioner, the CEO of ERCOT and the governor (or the governor's representative). This bill was one of the PUC's recommendations in its Scope of Competition Report to the Legislature.
|PUC Program to Monitor Cybersecurity Efforts
SB 64, revising cybersecurity requirements for state agency information resources, including oversight of cybersecurity practices and the state's electric grid, has also been sent to the governor for signature. The bill requires the PUC to establish a program to monitor cybersecurity efforts among utilities in Texas, defining utilities as electric co-ops, electric utilities, municipally owned electric utilities, retail electric providers, and transmission and distribution utilities. It also requires ERCOT to conduct an internal cybersecurity risk assessment, vulnerability testing, and employee training, and to submit an annual report to the PUC on compliance with applicable cybersecurity and information security laws. If it becomes law, the bill would take effect Sept. 1.
Lauren Cabral is an Austin-based attorney with Husch Blackwell.This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Virtue Begets Virtue': Tips for Practicing Law (and Living) Ethically
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250